17 Aug 2010 13:29
jerky movements with .MTS files
Atte André Jensen <atte <at> email.dk>
2010-08-17 11:29:40 GMT
2010-08-17 11:29:40 GMT
Hi I know next to nothing about video but was pleased to find that I could easily edit the files of my canon hf200 into a "real movie" with kino. I then made a DVD with mandvd, but watching the result on my 42" HD LCD tv was quite a disappointment, unfortunately. When there's movement in the video, it's quite jerly, like the movement goes a bit in the right direction, a tiny bit back, a bit in the right direction, a tiny bit back and so on. It's doesn't look like camera shake, esp since 1) the camera has image stabilizer and 2) the videos play back just great with the camera connected directly to the tv via hdmi. Although the result seems worse on the final dvd on the tv, there seems to be already traces of the problem in the .MTS.dv files made by kino upon import. This leads me to believe that the problem is in fact in the import process, handled by /usr/share/kino/scripts/import/media.sh. I looked and it seems that media.sh converts the video to either 25 fps or 30000/1001 fps. I looked in the camera menus and the camera is set to it default frame rate of 50i, setting it to "pf25" (I asume this means non-interlaced 25 fps). A quick test suggests that setting this to "pf25" gets rid of the problem, but that was a really quick test, so... In any case, it doesn't help with my 400+ files already recorded on 50i. So, I'm looking for any advice on how to get rid of this annoying problem. Any thoughts or anything I should try? I could mail a problematic .MTS file, it that would help in tracking down the problem. NB: I noticed that when exporting the video (at least with "YUV film-like") kino outputs "Stream is interlaced, bottom-field-first" in the terminal, dunno if this information is relevant... However using(Continue reading)
I'm using melt 0.5.4, which I seemed I already had installed, probably
came with something else (I'm using ubuntu 10.4). Could the problem be
due to an outdated version? Or am I missing something?
A minor detail: players will see the files comming out of this command
as 4:3, when they are in fact 16:9. Not a big deal, since I have 16:9
set in the kino prefs, forcing kino to treat them as 16:9...
In any case I'm pleased to learn that what I experienced is not "just
me", but a well-known problem with interlaced video! Would I loose
anything, quality-wise, by using non-interlaced 25fps from now on
instead of interlaced 50fps (if I read the setting in the camera correctly)?
I hope to get this solved
RSS Feed