Re: [foaf-dev] Minor inconsistency in spec doc

On 3 Feb 2009, at 11:49, Dan Brickley wrote:

> On 3/2/09 11:41, Olivier GENDRIN wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Danny  
>> Ayers<danny.ayers@...>  wrote:
>>> Personally I think it should be foaf:Agent throughout, a bit more
>>> flexible, though won't lose any sleep with foaf:Person.
>>
>> I agree, it would allow to indicate the foaf:interest of a company,  
>> a NGO, ...
>>
>
> Good catch Danny. I agree it would be useful to have this for  
> foaf:Agent.
>
> Any objections to broadening the rdfs:domain from foaf:Person?

no objections from me.

> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-dev mailing list
> foaf-dev@...
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev