Matthias L. Jugel | 11 Oct 21:11
Picon

Re: Shared File DBs

taking over should not be a problem if the same global config data is  
used. To exactly see what has gone wrong I need the output of  
catalina.out

Leo.

On 11.10.2005, at 13:57, MONTGOMERY, ANDREW [AG-Contractor/1000] wrote:

> Leo,
>
> Interesting.  So, would my concerns still be warranted under a fail- 
> over
> situation?  Where there would be two tomcat instances but neither  
> would be
> operating at the same time.
>
> I did some testing/playing with multiple wars and single file dbs  
> and found
> that while the instance would start (passes the folder exists check  
> for the
> file db) it would not properly initialize the snipsnap engine (or  
> something
> internal) because of something dealing with multiple mappings to a '/'
> context.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrew
>
> -- I apologize for my "this thing" or "something" phrases. I have only
(Continue reading)

Picon

RE: Shared File DBs

Leo,

Interesting.  So, would my concerns still be warranted under a fail-over
situation?  Where there would be two tomcat instances but neither would be
operating at the same time.

I did some testing/playing with multiple wars and single file dbs and found
that while the instance would start (passes the folder exists check for the
file db) it would not properly initialize the snipsnap engine (or something
internal) because of something dealing with multiple mappings to a '/'
context.

Cheers

Andrew

-- I apologize for my "this thing" or "something" phrases. I have only
started digging into the source code yesterday and there is quite a bit to
absorb.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias L. Jugel [mailto:leo <at> mud.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 3:20 AM
To: MONTGOMERY, ANDREW [AG-Contractor/1000]
Subject: Re: [SnipSnap-USERS] Shared File DBs

Hi,

you cannot share the same files with mutliple instances as the data  
is cached in memory and only written through to the store. This  
(Continue reading)


Gmane