Re: urxvt maximized

On 04/01/12 16:50 +0000, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@...> wrote:
>> On 4 January 2012 15:38, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Mikael Magnusson
<mikachu@...> wrote:
>>>> On 4 January 2012 12:54, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@...> wrote:
>>>>> I've noticed a problem with rxvt-unicode: when a window is maximized, an
>>>>> obnoxious unusable strip appears at the bottom of the window (about 1/2
>>>>> cm of heigth). The strip disappears when the window is unmaximized. I
>>>>> have no idea whether this happens in other WMs. I currently have no
>>>>> other WM installed. xterm does not exhibit this behavior. Anyone with
>>>>> this problem?
>>>>>
>>
>> Could you explain what the actual problem is? xterm behaves the same
>> as urxvt for me, ie, any line or column that cannot fully fit a cell
>> is left empty and unused.
>>
>http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~jalmeida/urxvt_max.png
>http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~jalmeida/xterm_max.png
>http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~jalmeida/nomax.png
>
>The first picture shows the obnoxious dark blue strip at the bottom, the
>second doesn't. Both have a regular blue strip that is vim-specific, and
>has nothing to do with this. In bash, writing at the bottom of the
>maximized urxvt window means writing just above the dark blue strip,
>which is annoying. The third shows non-maximized windows, with the
>expected behavior.
>
>Of course, this problem may not be related to openbox at all...