12 Mar 04:03
Litestep.Info
From: Darrin Roenfanz <darrin.roenfanz@...>
Subject: Litestep.Info
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep
Date: 2008-03-12 03:05:07 GMT
Subject: Litestep.Info
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep
Date: 2008-03-12 03:05:07 GMT
As some of you might remember, there was a large amount of talk semi-recently regarding bringing litestep.info back online. A lot of talk, not much action, both on here and on West's board (which seems to be down(Continue reading)) The site's intent was to be an "informative", user-friendly place for new and prospective users. Anyhow, I thought it prudent to ask YOU, the litestep users, what sort of ideas could be seen as "informative" and thus, something to be considered as content for the site. As I recall, things "we" DON'T want: * Forums -- We have enough of these. I don't really think having forums is necessary. * Wiki -- Dont think another one of this is needed either, as we already have one: http://wiki.litestep.com.ar/Index (Note: Although, I like the idea of a wiki.litestep.info mirror/redirect thing) * Themes -- We have SEVERAL sites that cover this as well. Also, doesn't fit into the scope of the site either. Things we "do" like/want: * Module Documentation: This is a *big* undertaking however, and not something that would be available at launch. * Articles/Tutorials: o Theme Reviews: This was discussed on the forums, I think it would be a nice idea to do a weekly review of a theme, with
)
The site's intent was to be an "informative", user-friendly place for
new and prospective users.
Anyhow, I thought it prudent to ask YOU, the litestep users, what sort
of ideas could be seen as "informative" and thus, something to be
considered as content for the site.
As I recall, things "we" DON'T want:
* Forums -- We have enough of these. I don't really think having
forums is necessary.
* Wiki -- Dont think another one of this is needed either, as we
already have one:
RSS Feed