Darrin Roenfanz | 12 Mar 04:03
Favicon

Litestep.Info

As some of you might remember, there was a large amount of talk 
semi-recently regarding bringing litestep.info back online. A lot of 
talk, not much action, both on here and on West's board (which seems to 
be down :-( )

The site's intent was to be an "informative", user-friendly place for 
new and prospective users.

Anyhow, I thought it prudent to ask YOU, the litestep users, what sort 
of ideas could be seen as "informative" and thus, something to be 
considered as content for the site.

As I recall, things "we" DON'T want:

    * Forums -- We have enough of these. I don't really think having
      forums is necessary.
    * Wiki -- Dont think another one of this is needed either, as we
      already have one: http://wiki.litestep.com.ar/Index (Note:
      Although, I like the idea of a wiki.litestep.info mirror/redirect
      thing)
    * Themes -- We have SEVERAL sites that cover this as well. Also,
      doesn't fit into the scope of the site either.

Things we "do" like/want:

    * Module Documentation: This is a *big* undertaking however, and not
      something that would be available at launch.
    * Articles/Tutorials:
          o Theme Reviews: This was discussed on the forums, I think it
            would be a nice idea to do a weekly review of a theme, with
(Continue reading)

Arve Barsnes | 12 Mar 06:57

Re: Litestep.Info

I like the design. Keep it simple :)

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:05 AM, Darrin Roenfanz
<darrin.roenfanz@...> wrote:
> As some of you might remember, there was a large amount of talk
>  semi-recently regarding bringing litestep.info back online. A lot of
>  talk, not much action, both on here and on West's board (which seems to
>  be down :-( )
>
>  The site's intent was to be an "informative", user-friendly place for
>  new and prospective users.
>
>  Anyhow, I thought it prudent to ask YOU, the litestep users, what sort
>  of ideas could be seen as "informative" and thus, something to be
>  considered as content for the site.
>
>  As I recall, things "we" DON'T want:
>
>     * Forums -- We have enough of these. I don't really think having
>       forums is necessary.
>     * Wiki -- Dont think another one of this is needed either, as we
>       already have one: http://wiki.litestep.com.ar/Index (Note:
>       Although, I like the idea of a wiki.litestep.info mirror/redirect
>       thing)
>     * Themes -- We have SEVERAL sites that cover this as well. Also,
>       doesn't fit into the scope of the site either.
>
>
>  Things we "do" like/want:
>
(Continue reading)

Xjill | 16 Mar 16:43

Re: Litestep.Info

I like the design too, however, I feel the "progress updates" menu
should be on the right. As it is now it looks like a sub menu instead
of a feed. Also, your "Installer" link is dead :-(  Tobbe?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org

Tobbe Lundberg | 16 Mar 17:12

Re: Litestep.Info

> Also, your "Installer" link is dead :-(  Tobbe?
>

Yeah, I know :(
It's fixed now however :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


Gmane