Nat Russo | 2 Jun 2012 18:39
Picon
Gravatar

Question: Logistics of writing

Hi Ray,


I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process.  Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?  

The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor.  As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word.  During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work.  On the iPad I use Pages.  This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export.  I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".

It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file.  Just curious about your thoughts and work process.

Thanks,
Nat

--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.

Tim Hickey | 2 Jun 2012 19:00
Picon

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

I am not Ray, but for loss reasons, why don't you use Google Documents / Drive. It's free, it's safely backed up and you can use it anywhere. Plus formatting remains the same. You can also edit it offline.

On Jun 2, 2012 11:40 AM, "Nat Russo" <nat.russo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Hi Ray,

I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process.  Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?  

The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor.  As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word.  During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work.  On the iPad I use Pages.  This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export.  I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".

It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file.  Just curious about your thoughts and work process.

Thanks,
Nat

--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.

Nat Russo | 2 Jun 2012 19:03
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

I actually do use Google Docs for storage, but I find Word to be a better editor than the online Google Docs editor (and I don't always have access to the web...my iPad is 3G only).  Didn't know about the offline editing.  I'll check into that.

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Tim Hickey <twhffm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I am not Ray, but for loss reasons, why don't you use Google Documents / Drive. It's free, it's safely backed up and you can use it anywhere. Plus formatting remains the same. You can also edit it offline.

On Jun 2, 2012 11:40 AM, "Nat Russo" <nat.russo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Ray,

I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process.  Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?  

The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor.  As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word.  During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work.  On the iPad I use Pages.  This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export.  I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".

It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file.  Just curious about your thoughts and work process.

Thanks,
Nat

--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.




--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.

Nat Russo | 2 Jun 2012 19:29
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold true in your professional experience?


Thanks again,
Nat

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Nat Russo <nat.russo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Hi Ray,

I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process.  Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?  

The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor.  As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word.  During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work.  On the iPad I use Pages.  This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export.  I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".

It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file.  Just curious about your thoughts and work process.

Thanks,
Nat

--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.




--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.

Raymond E. Feist | 2 Jun 2012 19:49

Re: Question: Logistics of writing


On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for
manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold
true in your professional experience?

I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc.  Habit mostly.  I'm sure
anything that's clearly readable is acceptable.  Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.

Best, R.E.F.

----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.

Nat Russo | 2 Jun 2012 20:08
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

Thanks, Ray!  As always, I appreciate the time you take to answer my newbie questions.  Google was less than helpful, and I'd trust your opinion over some random writer/editor on the web any day of the week.


Nat

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Raymond E. Feist <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold true in your professional experience?

I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc.  Habit mostly.  I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable.  Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.

Best, R.E.F.

----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.










--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.

Dave White | 2 Jun 2012 20:28
Picon

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.

On Jun 2, 2012 7:49 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold true in your professional experience?

I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc.  Habit mostly.  I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable.  Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.

Best, R.E.F.

----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.







Raymond E. Feist | 2 Jun 2012 20:34

Re: Question: Logistics of writing


On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Dave White wrote:

So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.

O

Don't like a mouse, so I use a trackball.  Kensington makes one that works well.  Only problem is you have to clean it from time to time or it gets grungy and the cursor leaps around the screen.  I haven't found a keyboard to fall in love with.  I've tried a number of them.  Right now I'm using one from Macally that's OK, but I like full size and positive feedback (clicky), and I'm not found of membrane for that reason.

Best, R.E.F.

----

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.





Robert M. | 2 Jun 2012 20:55
Favicon

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

Ray,

I'm with you when it comes to keyboards. I've found several usb models that are similar in feel to the Apple keyboards of old. I'm on the road now typing on an iphone but will send details when i get home. :)

Best regards,

Robert



On Jun 2, 2012, at 2:34 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:


On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Dave White wrote:

So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.

O

Don't like a mouse, so I use a trackball.  Kensington makes one that works well.  Only problem is you have to clean it from time to time or it gets grungy and the cursor leaps around the screen.  I haven't found a keyboard to fall in love with.  I've tried a number of them.  Right now I'm using one from Macally that's OK, but I like full size and positive feedback (clicky), and I'm not found of membrane for that reason.

Best, R.E.F.

----

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.





Chris Fowler | 3 Jun 2012 15:16

Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(
 
 
--Chris--
joel langton | 3 Jun 2012 19:19
Picon

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is this edition, a complete set in hardback form?

It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an edition really worth?


On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(
 
 
--Chris--

John Buttimer | 3 Jun 2012 20:36
Picon
Favicon

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is this edition, a complete set in hardback form?

It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an edition really worth?


On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(
 
 
--Chris--

Chris Fowler | 4 Jun 2012 13:05

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get it.
 
It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies belief :(
 
--Chris--
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is this edition, a complete set in hardback form?

It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an edition really worth?


On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(
 
 
--Chris--

Matthias Zimmermann | 4 Jun 2012 13:35
Picon

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

Apperantly amazon.com hast it a less expensive ... a treat for $527.86

<www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785139877/>

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote:
> That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some
> reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same
> has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get
> it.
>
> It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching
> and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I
> got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it
> was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies
> belief :(
>
> --Chris--
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Buttimer
> To: feistfans-l
> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master
>
> Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton@...> wrote:
>
> I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track.
> I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they
> did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is
> this edition, a complete set in hardback form?
>
> It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an
> edition really worth?
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote:
>>
>> OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for
>> it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be
>> releasing it :(
>>
>>
>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master/dp/0785139877/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&coliid=I11LVQ4YD0LW03&colid=14RK8KYYT3LJH
>>
>> --Chris--
>
>

Paul Dutton | 4 Jun 2012 13:41

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

How do they get prices like this? And six pence!?

Paul

Sent from my iPad

On 4 Jun 2012, at 12:35, Matthias Zimmermann <feistfans-l@...> wrote:

> Apperantly amazon.com hast it a less expensive ... a treat for $527.86
> 
> <www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785139877/>
> 
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote:
>> That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some
>> reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same
>> has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get
>> it.
>> 
>> It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching
>> and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I
>> got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it
>> was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies
>> belief :(
>> 
>> --Chris--
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: John Buttimer
>> To: feistfans-l
>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master
>> 
>> Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor!
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton@...> wrote:
>> 
>> I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track.
>> I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they
>> did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is
>> this edition, a complete set in hardback form?
>> 
>> It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an
>> edition really worth?
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote:
>>> 
>>> OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for
>>> it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be
>>> releasing it :(
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master/dp/0785139877/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&coliid=I11LVQ4YD0LW03&colid=14RK8KYYT3LJH
>>> 
>>> --Chris--
>> 
>> 
> 

Matthias Zimmermann | 4 Jun 2012 13:58
Picon

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

Probably these prices should look like they are calculated as sharp as
a razor and with narrow margin as possible .... :D

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Paul Dutton <mrduttz@...> wrote:
> How do they get prices like this? And six pence!?
>
> Paul
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 12:35, Matthias Zimmermann
<feistfans-l@...> wrote:
>
>> Apperantly amazon.com hast it a less expensive ... a treat for $527.86
>>
>> <www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785139877/>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote:
>>> That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some
>>> reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same
>>> has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get
>>> it.
>>>
>>> It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching
>>> and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I
>>> got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it
>>> was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies
>>> belief :(
>>>
>>> --Chris--
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: John Buttimer
>>> To: feistfans-l
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master
>>>
>>> Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor!
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track.
>>> I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they
>>> did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is
>>> this edition, a complete set in hardback form?
>>>
>>> It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an
>>> edition really worth?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for
>>>> it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be
>>>> releasing it :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master/dp/0785139877/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&coliid=I11LVQ4YD0LW03&colid=14RK8KYYT3LJH
>>>>
>>>> --Chris--
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Dave White | 3 Jun 2012 20:32
Picon

Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master

£1702.06... Not £1700, or £1750, but £1702.06. It's listed on Amazon's UK website, but possibly imported from somewhere?

On Jun 3, 2012 5:19 PM, "Chris Fowler" <ckrisf-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(
 
 
--Chris--
Chris Fowler | 3 Jun 2012 15:01

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

The best keyboard that I've come across is the Microsoft Natural multimedia 1.a, every time I upgrade my PC it's moved across to the new one, as it's ergonomic I find it more comfortable I just can't seem to get back in to using the normal types anymore, don't know what I'd do if I found my self having to replace it :(
 
--Chris--
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert M.
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: Question: Logistics of writing

Ray,

I'm with you when it comes to keyboards. I've found several usb models that are similar in feel to the Apple keyboards of old. I'm on the road now typing on an iphone but will send details when i get home. :)

Best regards,

Robert



On Jun 2, 2012, at 2:34 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:


On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Dave White wrote:

So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.

O

Don't like a mouse, so I use a trackball.  Kensington makes one that works well.  Only problem is you have to clean it from time to time or it gets grungy and the cursor leaps around the screen.  I haven't found a keyboard to fall in love with.  I've tried a number of them.  Right now I'm using one from Macally that's OK, but I like full size and positive feedback (clicky), and I'm not found of membrane for that reason.

Best, R.E.F.

----

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.





Mat Fisher | 4 Jun 2012 15:58

RE: Question: Logistics of writing

I 100% agree, whenever I start a new contract, I bring my own keyboard and mouse (I like the Microsoft Natural keyboard, and usually a nice gaming mouse, even though I don’t game they are quite comfortable and I can set up the extra buttons to thing like “Build” etc…).

 

Mat

 

From: bounce-61037354-25410917-Re1fH9pVRcMibAbXQ5Tkjg@public.gmane.org [mailto:bounce-61037354-25410917 <at> list.cornell.edu] On Behalf Of Dave White
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 2:29 PM
To: feistfans-l
Subject: Re: Question: Logistics of writing

 

So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.

On Jun 2, 2012 7:49 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:


On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold true in your professional experience?

I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc.  Habit mostly.  I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable.  Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.

Best, R.E.F.

----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.








This e-mail communication, including all attachments, may contain private, proprietary, privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, copying or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, and have received it in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.
Chris Fowler | 4 Jun 2012 16:55

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

Lol I love my gaming mouse, would not be without that either :)
 
--Chris--
----- Original Message -----
From: Mat Fisher
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: Question: Logistics of writing

I 100% agree, whenever I start a new contract, I bring my own keyboard and mouse (I like the Microsoft Natural keyboard, and usually a nice gaming mouse, even though I don’t game they are quite comfortable and I can set up the extra buttons to thing like “Build” etc…).

 

Mat

 

From: bounce-61037354-25410917-Re1fH9pVRcMibAbXQ5Tkjg@public.gmane.org [mailto:bounce-61037354-25410917-Re1fH9pVRcMibAbXQ5Tkjg@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Dave White
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 2:29 PM
To: feistfans-l
Subject: Re: Question: Logistics of writing

 

So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.

On Jun 2, 2012 7:49 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:


On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold true in your professional experience?

I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc.  Habit mostly.  I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable.  Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.

Best, R.E.F.

----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.








This e-mail communication, including all attachments, may contain private, proprietary, privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, copying or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, and have received it in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.
Nat Russo | 9 Jun 2012 18:25
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Raymond E. Feist <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two:  I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points".  Does this hold true in your professional experience?

I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc.  Habit mostly.  I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable.  Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.

Best, R.E.F.

----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.




Crazy Windows computer...  It seems I have "Courier New" on my system, but not "Courier".  I noticed that Pages on my iPad has both. 

Nat

--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.

Raymond Feist | 9 Jun 2012 19:26

Re: Question: Logistics of writing


On Jun 9, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Nat Russo wrote:



Crazy Windows computer...  It seems I have "Courier New" on my system, but not "Courier".  I noticed that Pages on my iPad has both. 

Nat

--

There are a bazillion type fonts.  Courier missing is odd, as it's one of the fundamentals, along with Helvetica, Times Roman, Schoolbook, etc.  Courier New is pretty much the same thing with slightly different spacing, I think. 

Best, R.E.F.

----

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.





dershem | 9 Jun 2012 21:45
Picon

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

On 6/9/2012 10:26 AM, Raymond Feist wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Crazy Windows computer... It seems I have "Courier New" on my system,
>> but not "Courier". I noticed that Pages on my iPad has both.
>>
>> Nat
>>
>> --
>
> There are a bazillion type fonts. Courier missing is odd, as it's one of
> the fundamentals, along with Helvetica, Times Roman, Schoolbook, etc.
> Courier New is pretty much the same thing with slightly different
> spacing, I think.
>
> Best, R.E.F.

Because the companies that own fonts often charge for them, slightly 
altered versions of standard fonts have been put out there by companies 
that value profit above ... everything.  Therefore Times Roman has been 
supplanted by Times New Roman, Helvetica by Arial, Courier by Courier 
New, etc.

Most people can't see the differences, but they are there.

cd
--

-- 
http://projectselene.com

=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18500)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======

Raymond E. Feist | 2 Jun 2012 19:48

Re: Question: Logistics of writing


On Jun 2, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Hi Ray,
> 
> I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process.  Do
you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out
into individual files?  
> 
> The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor.  As
odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word.  During those times, I grab my
bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work.  On the iPad I use Pages.  This works, for the
most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same
definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything
back in proper order after an import/export.  I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of
my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you
shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".
> 
> It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file. 
Just curious about your thoughts and work process.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nat
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
> 

All I use is Pages and when it's time to send files to my publisher I just export them as Word and I'm done with
it.  I actually prefer Pages by a large margin.

As for the rest, I keep each chapter as a single file.  Because I send them to my editors as I finish the 1st
drafts.  However, when they come back to me as a single file, it's really easy to check continuity and things
like that by simple searches within one big file.  One of the reasons for the continuity disaster in Crown
was we didn't have time for that step and I sent back the wrong version of a file.

Anyway, do what works for you and you're the most comfortable with.

Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.

Nat Russo | 2 Jun 2012 20:10
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Question: Logistics of writing

I wish their was a Windows port of Pages.  I really like the stripped-down version of it on the iPad.  

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Raymond E. Feist <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Jun 2, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Nat Russo wrote:

> Hi Ray,
>
> I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process.  Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?
>
> The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor.  As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word.  During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work.  On the iPad I use Pages.  This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export.  I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".
>
> It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file.  Just curious about your thoughts and work process.
>
> Thanks,
> Nat
>
> --
> Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
>



All I use is Pages and when it's time to send files to my publisher I just export them as Word and I'm done with it.  I actually prefer Pages by a large margin.

As for the rest, I keep each chapter as a single file.  Because I send them to my editors as I finish the 1st drafts.  However, when they come back to me as a single file, it's really easy to check continuity and things like that by simple searches within one big file.  One of the reasons for the continuity disaster in Crown was we didn't have time for that step and I sent back the wrong version of a file.

Anyway, do what works for you and you're the most comfortable with.

Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com

Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.










--
Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.


Gmane