Question: Logistics of writing
Hi Ray,
Hi Ray,
I am not Ray, but for loss reasons, why don't you use Google Documents / Drive. It's free, it's safely backed up and you can use it anywhere. Plus formatting remains the same. You can also edit it offline.
Hi Ray,I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process. Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor. As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word. During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work. On the iPad I use Pages. This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export. I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file. Just curious about your thoughts and work process.Thanks,Nat--Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
I actually do use Google Docs for storage, but I find Word to be a better editor than the online Google Docs editor (and I don't always have access to the web...my iPad is 3G only). Didn't know about the offline editing. I'll check into that.
I am not Ray, but for loss reasons, why don't you use Google Documents / Drive. It's free, it's safely backed up and you can use it anywhere. Plus formatting remains the same. You can also edit it offline.
On Jun 2, 2012 11:40 AM, "Nat Russo" <nat.russo <at> gmail.com> wrote:Hi Ray,I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process. Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor. As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word. During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work. On the iPad I use Pages. This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export. I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file. Just curious about your thoughts and work process.Thanks,Nat--Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience?
Hi Ray,I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process. Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor. As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word. During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work. On the iPad I use Pages. This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export. I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file. Just curious about your thoughts and work process.Thanks,Nat--Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote: > Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience? I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc. Habit mostly. I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable. Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard. Best, R.E.F. ---- www.crydee.com Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
Thanks, Ray! As always, I appreciate the time you take to answer my newbie questions. Google was less than helpful, and I'd trust your opinion over some random writer/editor on the web any day of the week.
I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc. Habit mostly. I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable. Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.
On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience?
Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com
Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.
On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience?
I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc. Habit mostly. I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable. Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.
Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com
Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.O
On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Dave White wrote:So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.O
Don't like a mouse, so I use a trackball. Kensington makes one that works well. Only problem is you have to clean it from time to time or it gets grungy and the cursor leaps around the screen. I haven't found a keyboard to fall in love with. I've tried a number of them. Right now I'm using one from Macally that's OK, but I like full size and positive feedback (clicky), and I'm not found of membrane for that reason.Best, R.E.F.----Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is this edition, a complete set in hardback form?
It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an edition really worth?
OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(--Chris--
I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is this edition, a complete set in hardback form?
It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an edition really worth?On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(--Chris--
----- Original Message -----From: John ButtimerTo: feistfans-lSent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PMSubject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-MasterWow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is this edition, a complete set in hardback form?
It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an edition really worth?On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(--Chris--
Apperantly amazon.com hast it a less expensive ... a treat for $527.86 <www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785139877/> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote: > That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some > reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same > has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get > it. > > It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching > and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I > got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it > was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies > belief :( > > --Chris-- > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: John Buttimer > To: feistfans-l > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master > > Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton@...> wrote: > > I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. > I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they > did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is > this edition, a complete set in hardback form? > > It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an > edition really worth? > > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote: >> >> OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for >> it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be >> releasing it :( >> >> >> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master/dp/0785139877/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&coliid=I11LVQ4YD0LW03&colid=14RK8KYYT3LJH >> >> --Chris-- > >
How do they get prices like this? And six pence!? Paul Sent from my iPad On 4 Jun 2012, at 12:35, Matthias Zimmermann <feistfans-l@...> wrote: > Apperantly amazon.com hast it a less expensive ... a treat for $527.86 > > <www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785139877/> > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote: >> That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some >> reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same >> has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get >> it. >> >> It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching >> and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I >> got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it >> was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies >> belief :( >> >> --Chris-- >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: John Buttimer >> To: feistfans-l >> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM >> Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master >> >> Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor! >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton@...> wrote: >> >> I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. >> I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they >> did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is >> this edition, a complete set in hardback form? >> >> It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an >> edition really worth? >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote: >>> >>> OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for >>> it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be >>> releasing it :( >>> >>> >>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master/dp/0785139877/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&coliid=I11LVQ4YD0LW03&colid=14RK8KYYT3LJH >>> >>> --Chris-- >> >> >
Probably these prices should look like they are calculated as sharp as a razor and with narrow margin as possible .... :D On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Paul Dutton <mrduttz@...> wrote: > How do they get prices like this? And six pence!? > > Paul > > Sent from my iPad > > On 4 Jun 2012, at 12:35, Matthias Zimmermann <feistfans-l@...> wrote: > >> Apperantly amazon.com hast it a less expensive ... a treat for $527.86 >> >> <www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785139877/> >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote: >>> That's the problem there were very few released apparently, then for some >>> reason it was stopped, and due for re-release which never happened, the same >>> has happened to the paperback version, it's driving me nuts trying to get >>> it. >>> >>> It was released at a price of $24.99 on November 24th 2010, I was watching >>> and watching, even had it on pre-order at Amazon and forbidden planet, all I >>> got was email after email telling me it had been delayed, and then saying it >>> was no longer going to be released in hardback, now to see this just defies >>> belief :( >>> >>> --Chris-- >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: John Buttimer >>> To: feistfans-l >>> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 7:36 PM >>> Subject: Re: Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master >>> >>> Wow when was this released? Love Tomas's armor! >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:19 PM, joel langton <joellangton@...> wrote: >>> >>> I havent followed all these comic editions, cause I got ill and lost track. >>> I have a few of the actual comic editions, the first set or two that they >>> did, and I got vol1 and 2 of the hardback compilations they did. What is >>> this edition, a complete set in hardback form? >>> >>> It looks steep whatever the edition, but what do i know. How much is an >>> edition really worth? >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Chris Fowler <ckrisf@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for >>>> it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be >>>> releasing it :( >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Raymond-E-Feists-Magician-Master/dp/0785139877/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_nC?ie=UTF8&coliid=I11LVQ4YD0LW03&colid=14RK8KYYT3LJH >>>> >>>> --Chris-- >>> >>> >> > >
£1702.06... Not £1700, or £1750, but £1702.06. It's listed on Amazon's UK website, but possibly imported from somewhere?
OMG this guy is having a laugh, I want it but am not paying that price for it, am giving up hope of ever getting it as Marvel just don't seem to be releasing it :(--Chris--
----- Original Message -----From: Robert M.To: feistfans-lSent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 7:55 PMSubject: Re: Question: Logistics of writingRay,I'm with you when it comes to keyboards. I've found several usb models that are similar in feel to the Apple keyboards of old. I'm on the road now typing on an iphone but will send details when i get home. :)Best regards,Robert
On Jun 2, 2012, at 2:34 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Dave White wrote:So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.O
Don't like a mouse, so I use a trackball. Kensington makes one that works well. Only problem is you have to clean it from time to time or it gets grungy and the cursor leaps around the screen. I haven't found a keyboard to fall in love with. I've tried a number of them. Right now I'm using one from Macally that's OK, but I like full size and positive feedback (clicky), and I'm not found of membrane for that reason.Best, R.E.F.----Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
I 100% agree, whenever I start a new contract, I bring my own keyboard and mouse (I like the Microsoft Natural keyboard, and usually a nice gaming mouse, even though I don’t game they are quite comfortable and I can set up the extra buttons to thing like “Build” etc…).
Mat
From: bounce-61037354-25410917-Re1fH9pVRcMibAbXQ5Tkjg@public.gmane.org [mailto:bounce-61037354-25410917 <at> list.cornell.edu]
On Behalf Of Dave White
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 2:29 PM
To: feistfans-l
Subject: Re: Question: Logistics of writing
So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.
On Jun 2, 2012 7:49 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience?
I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc. Habit mostly. I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable. Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.
Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com
Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
----- Original Message -----From: Mat FisherTo: feistfans-lSent: Monday, June 04, 2012 2:58 PMSubject: RE: Question: Logistics of writingI 100% agree, whenever I start a new contract, I bring my own keyboard and mouse (I like the Microsoft Natural keyboard, and usually a nice gaming mouse, even though I dont game they are quite comfortable and I can set up the extra buttons to thing like Build etc ).
Mat
From: bounce-61037354-25410917-Re1fH9pVRcMibAbXQ5Tkjg@public.gmane.org [mailto:bounce-61037354-25410917-Re1fH9pVRcMibAbXQ5Tkjg@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Dave White
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 2:29 PM
To: feistfans-l
Subject: Re: Question: Logistics of writing
So in that vein do you also have a favorite type of keyboard? Do you like "clickey" full size keys or the softer membrane ones. Does it make a difference to your concentration I'd you aren't using your "favourite" keyboard?
As a developer I find that when I can forget my environment then I'm at my most productive. For me that means using my favourite keyboard and mouse.On Jun 2, 2012 7:49 PM, "Raymond E. Feist" <raymond-n5ZIaH6+9ICB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience?
I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc. Habit mostly. I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable. Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.
Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com
Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
This e-mail communication, including all attachments, may contain private, proprietary, privileged and/or confidential information and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, copying or distribution of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, and have received it in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.
I use Courier 12, because it's the closest you're going to get to an old IBM Selectrc. Habit mostly. I'm sure anything that's clearly readable is acceptable. Editors prefer serif fonts, and 12 point is pretty standard.
On Jun 2, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
> Sorry, Ray, I meant to include question two: I've seen a lot of differing opinion about font choices for manuscripts, but they all seem to boil down to "choose a standard Serif font at 12 points". Does this hold true in your professional experience?
Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com
Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
Crazy Windows computer... It seems I have "Courier New" on my system, but not "Courier". I noticed that Pages on my iPad has both.Nat--
On 6/9/2012 10:26 AM, Raymond Feist wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Nat Russo wrote: > >> >> >> Crazy Windows computer... It seems I have "Courier New" on my system, >> but not "Courier". I noticed that Pages on my iPad has both. >> >> Nat >> >> -- > > There are a bazillion type fonts. Courier missing is odd, as it's one of > the fundamentals, along with Helvetica, Times Roman, Schoolbook, etc. > Courier New is pretty much the same thing with slightly different > spacing, I think. > > Best, R.E.F. Because the companies that own fonts often charge for them, slightly altered versions of standard fonts have been put out there by companies that value profit above ... everything. Therefore Times Roman has been supplanted by Times New Roman, Helvetica by Arial, Courier by Courier New, etc. Most people can't see the differences, but they are there. cd -- -- http://projectselene.com ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.18500) http://www.pctools.com/ =======
On Jun 2, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Nat Russo wrote: > Hi Ray, > > I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process. Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files? > > The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor. As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word. During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work. On the iPad I use Pages. This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export. I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works". > > It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file. Just curious about your thoughts and work process. > > Thanks, > Nat > > -- > Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser. > All I use is Pages and when it's time to send files to my publisher I just export them as Word and I'm done with it. I actually prefer Pages by a large margin. As for the rest, I keep each chapter as a single file. Because I send them to my editors as I finish the 1st drafts. However, when they come back to me as a single file, it's really easy to check continuity and things like that by simple searches within one big file. One of the reasons for the continuity disaster in Crown was we didn't have time for that step and I sent back the wrong version of a file. Anyway, do what works for you and you're the most comfortable with. Best, R.E.F. ---- www.crydee.com Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
I wish their was a Windows port of Pages. I really like the stripped-down version of it on the iPad.
All I use is Pages and when it's time to send files to my publisher I just export them as Word and I'm done with it. I actually prefer Pages by a large margin.
On Jun 2, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Nat Russo wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> I have a question that seems to be more about your working process, as opposed to your writing process. Do you find it more convenient to keep all of your chapters together in a single file, or do you break them out into individual files?
>
> The reason for the question is I've recently found myself needing to use more than one word processor. As odd as it sounds, I don't always have access to my laptop and Microsoft Word. During those times, I grab my bluetooth keyboard and my iPad and find a quiet place to work. On the iPad I use Pages. This works, for the most part, but I often struggle with formatting issues (e.g. "double spaced" doesn't always have the same definition from one program to the next), and this requires some tedious manual labor to get everything back in proper order after an import/export. I've been playing with the idea of separating the chapters of my book into individual files so that the "damage" is more contained, but I'm not sure if this is a "no, you shouldn't do that", "yes it's preferred", or "whatever works".
>
> It also occurred to me that there's a greater potential for loss of work if everything is in a single file. Just curious about your thoughts and work process.
>
> Thanks,
> Nat
>
> --
> Sent from my Crappy Laptop (tm) using a poor excuse for a web browser.
>
As for the rest, I keep each chapter as a single file. Because I send them to my editors as I finish the 1st drafts. However, when they come back to me as a single file, it's really easy to check continuity and things like that by simple searches within one big file. One of the reasons for the continuity disaster in Crown was we didn't have time for that step and I sent back the wrong version of a file.
Anyway, do what works for you and you're the most comfortable with.
Best, R.E.F.
----
www.crydee.com
Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by stupidity.
RSS Feed