headers
Uwe Stöhr | 7 Oct 03:18

[patch] layout file for the JASA journal

The attached patch adds a template and a layout file for the journal JASA
http://asa.aip.org/jasa.html
following the official author guidelines and using the official LaTeX class.

Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?

regards Uwe
Attachment (jasaLayout.diff): text/x-diff, 10 KiB
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | 7 Oct 07:32
Favicon

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

Le 7 oct. 08 à 03:22, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> The attached patch adds a template and a layout file for the  
> journal JASA
> http://asa.aip.org/jasa.html
> following the official author guidelines and using the official  
> LaTeX class.
>
> Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?

What about bug 5330, then?

JMarc
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Uwe Stöhr | 7 Oct 13:55

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:

> What about bug 5330, then?

This has nothing to do with this layout, I only used this as example.
Bug 5330 appears for any layout file that use now modularized include files. The example jasa layout
I attached as example to this bug report is not the one I attached.

regards Uwe
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Uwe Stöhr | 7 Oct 19:20

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:

>> Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?
> 
> What about bug 5330, then?

Although this bug had nothing to do with my layout file, it it fixed now by Richard.
Do I now get your OK?

regards Uwe
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | 7 Oct 19:55
Favicon

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

Le 7 oct. 08 à 19:20, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>>> Seeking for 2 OKs to go in. Jürgen, can this also go to branch?
>> What about bug 5330, then?
>
> Although this bug had nothing to do with my layout file, it it  
> fixed now by Richard.
> Do I now get your OK?

in principle yes, but i did not have time to look at it.

JMarc
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Uwe Stöhr | 8 Oct 01:24

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:

>> Do I now get your OK?
> 
> in principle yes, but i did not have time to look at it.

You don't have to. It is just another layout file from me (my 5th). So its structure and template is 
the same for my other layouts for other journals.

regards Uwe
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Richard Heck | 8 Oct 16:31
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>
>>> Do I now get your OK?
>>
>> in principle yes, but i did not have time to look at it.
>
> You don't have to. It is just another layout file from me (my 5th). So 
> its structure and template is the same for my other layouts for other 
> journals.
>
If you say it works, I'm prepared to take your word for it. Besides, 
layout files are easily repaired....

rh
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Uwe Stöhr | 9 Oct 14:50

Re: [patch] layout file for the JASA journal

 > If you say it works, I'm prepared to take your word for it.

It seems that the JASA officials are currently deciding what LaTeX class should be used in future, 
after I contacted them with my layout and template file. So before I didn't get a decision from 
them, I'll postpone this.

 > Besides, layout files are easily repaired....

In principle yes, but as you could see yesterday, even the obvious fix for dinbrief.layout broke the 
complete po-file creation as I accidentally used non-ASCII characters in LabelString.

regards Uwe
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane