Re: Updated SciTE installation package (scite-1.49-setup.exe)
Darren Schroeder <fdncred <at> cablelynx.com>
2002-11-07 12:54:48 GMT
Thanks, Dude. I like all my buffers monospace all the time.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Dodson" <bruce_dodson <at> bigfoot.com>
To: <scite-interest <at> lyra.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [scite] Updated SciTE installation package
> Sorry for the last. I accidentally clicked send before typing. Just
> to mention that I've sent Neil a patch for this and for another monospace
> bug that I spotted during testing. Neil mentioned to me, the monospace
> support has reached into many nooks and crannies, so I'm going to see what
> can do to make this feature easier to maintain.
> Has anyone noticed / does anyone care that you can have one buffer set to
> monospace, and another set to proportional, and each buffer will remember
> its own setting? This "per-buffer monospace setting" feature was
> in the bug Darren found. If the feature doesn't matter, the code would be
> cleaner without it. Without this feature, everything would be the same as
> it is now except that, when you toggle the monospace setting, all of your
> buffers would be affected at once. Would that be a problem?