Re: "more" suggestion

Ilya Sher wrote:

> |> What do you guys think if vim would switch from "more" to "less"
> |> so it would have the ability to scroll up / make a search in
> |> lists displayed for example by :let ?
> |
> |
> | Vim doesn't use an external program for the listing.
> 
> I meant the behaviour.
> 
> | There already is an item in the todo list to allow scrolling back
> | for commands that list items.  But this has to be implemented
> | separately for each listing, thus it will take time...
> |
> I looked here:
> http://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
> and haven't found that.
> What's the correct place to look ?

Here:

	ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/doc/todo.txt

You can imagine we don't want to add every item from the todo list to
the voting list.  Would take you hours to find an item to vote on! 

--

-- 
I'm not familiar with this proof, but I'm aware of a significant