Re: Schematron

thanks for your quick response. I totally agree with you. I like XMLMind 
for those good reasons 

Am 03.11.2010 10:34, schrieb Hussein Shafie:
> On 11/03/2010 08:44 AM, Dr. Marko Hedler wrote:
>> oh, what a pity.
>> Any plans to support other constraint-languages (e.g. asserts from XSD
>> 1.1 etc.)?
> We intend to fully support W3C XML Schema 1.1, but a few months after it
> becomes an official standard.
>
> More generally, XMLmind XML Editor is *not* the editor of choice if you
> are an early adopter of XML technologies. Obviously, SyncRO Soft
> <oXygen/>  -- http://www.oxygenxml.com/ -- is a much better choice in
> this case.
>
> We develop XMLmind XML Editor in order to have less features than our
> competitors, but to implement them very well and in the most usable manner.
>
> For example, XMLmind XML Editor includes a *native*, very fast,
> implementation of Schematron because, in that order, [1] we like
> Schematron and believe in it [2] DocBook 5 depends on it [3] We don't
> want our users to wait too long during validations against a Schematron
> schema.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Am 02.11.2010 20:53, schrieb Hussein Shafie: