5 Sep 02:40
Standards for which fields to index, and how
From: Paul Adasiak <fnpfa@...>
Subject: Standards for which fields to index, and how
Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.autocat
Date: 2008-09-05 00:42:39 GMT
Subject: Standards for which fields to index, and how
Newsgroups: gmane.education.libraries.autocat
Date: 2008-09-05 00:42:39 GMT
Are there standards available as to which MARC fields and subfields should be search- and browse-indexed? Or, if not, do you know of somebody's documentation (maybe yours?) of your search- and browse-indexed fields and subfields? I asked a similar question on 16 November 2006 and got replies from Charley Pennell and J. McRee Elrod, who pointed me to their in-house documentation. (So, gentlemen, there's no need to answer unless your outfits have changed their practices.) One of my department's priorities is to update the interface of our ill-functioning periodical article index (link below). I mentioned at a meeting that I'd come up with a list of proposals for fields and subfields that should be word-searchable and browseable -- then a colleague asked, "Is there a standard for that, that you could consult?" Good question. Is there? Or, if not, would anybody else be kind enough to share their documentation with me? -- -- Paul Adasiak, | Alaska and Polar Regions Department Metadata Coordinator | Elmer E. Rasmuson Library E-mail: fnpfa@... | University of Alaska Fairbanks Alaska & Polar Periodical Index: http://goldmine.uaf.edu/aprindex/ Alaska's Digital Archives: http://vilda.alaska.edu/ *********************************************************************** E-mail AUTOCAT listowners: autocat-request@...(Continue reading)
RSS Feed