gmane.emacs.auctex.devel

Uwe Brauer | 18 Jul 15:05

auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, no branch needed

Hello

It is true (finally), the problem of the generation of the correct
auto-autoloads files is solved, even without applying a patch to
XEmacs.rules; a thousand thanks to Mats for his help.

I committed  the new version right now into CVS.

Norbert please move the latest auctex version in pre-test to the
official dir.

The version just submitted should stay for say 2 weeks in pretest, not
much longer, since I have tested it myself for almost 3 month, without
problems. 

Norbert in case you encounter problems in generating the pkg, please let
me know.

Uwe Brauer

headers

Norbert Koch | 18 Jul 16:47

Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, no branch needed

* Uwe Brauer <oub <at> mat.ucm.es>:

Hello Uwe,

> Norbert in case you encounter problems in generating the pkg, please let
> me know.

It looks like you have succeeded in breaking the package smoketest.  Could
you please have a look at this?

http://labb.contactor.se/~matsl/smoketest/logs

Thanks, best regards,
norbert.

headers

Ralf Angeli | 19 Jul 10:41

Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, no branch needed

* Uwe Brauer (2008-07-18) writes:

> I committed  the new version right now into CVS.

Is there a reason you didn't use 11.85?  11.84 is already over one and a
half years old.  And especially with respect to XEmacs, font locking has
improved significantly in 11.85.

--

-- 
Ralf

auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, *no* branch needed

Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, *no* branch needed

Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, *no* branch needed

auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, no branch needed

Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, no branch needed

Re: auctex 11.84 submitted in the CVS tree, no branch needed