headers
Bjørn-Helge Mevik | 22 May 2003 16:53

Re: Add records to a search?

Hm.  + is undefined in my bbdb.  I'm running 2.34.  Guess I better upgrade.

--

-- 
Bjørn-Helge Mevik

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Harry Putnam | 22 May 2003 17:28
Favicon

Re: Add records to a search?

bhs2 <at> mevik.net (Bjørn-Helge Mevik) writes:

> Hm.  + is undefined in my bbdb.  I'm running 2.34.  Guess I better upgrade.
>

Isn't 2.34 the latest released version?  The plus doesn't work for me
either.  But I see no error message.

Can Stefan  be a little more specific about how this is used? 

bbdb <RET>
some_name + some_name2 <RET>

  or
bbdb <RET>
Some_NAME<RET>

 + Some_NAME2 <RET>

Is another `b' required?

None of those work for me but none throw an error either.

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info <at> lists.sourceforge.net
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
mailspam2 | 22 May 2003 18:28
Picon

Re: Add records to a search?

On Thursday, May 22, 2003 at 08:28:28, Harry Putnam wrote:
> bhs2 <at> mevik.net (Bjørn-Helge Mevik) writes:
> 
> > Hm.  + is undefined in my bbdb.  I'm running 2.34.  Guess I better
> > upgrade.
> >
> 
> Isn't 2.34 the latest released version?  The plus doesn't work for
> me either.  But I see no error message.

I see 2.35 here, but that is CVS ...

> Can Stefan  be a little more specific about how this is used? 
> 
> bbdb <RET>
> some_name + some_name2 <RET>
> 
>   or
> bbdb <RET>
> Some_NAME<RET>
> 
>  + Some_NAME2 <RET>
> 
> Is another `b' required?

+ should be bound to bbdb-append-records ...

In the BBDB-buffer:
/ somename1 RET
+
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Stefan Reichör | 23 May 2003 07:02
Picon

Re: Add records to a search?

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Harry Putnam outgrape:
>  Can Stefan  be a little more specific about how this is used? 
>  
>  bbdb <RET>
>  some_name + some_name2 <RET>
>  
>    or
>  bbdb <RET>
>  Some_NAME<RET>
>  
>   + Some_NAME2 <RET>
>  
>  Is another `b' required?
>  
>  None of those work for me but none throw an error either.

You hit:
b search RET
+ b search2 RET
+ b search3 RET

and so on...

From the manual:
+ runs the command bbdb-append-records
   which is an interactive Lisp function in `bbdb-com'.
It is bound to +.
(bbdb-append-records ARG)

Typing + in the *BBDB* buffer makes the next search/display command to append
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
bbdb | 22 May 2003 18:28
Picon

Re: Add records to a search?

On Thursday, May 22, 2003 at 08:28:28, Harry Putnam wrote:
> bhs2 <at> mevik.net (Bjørn-Helge Mevik) writes:
> 
> > Hm.  + is undefined in my bbdb.  I'm running 2.34.  Guess I better
> > upgrade.
> >
> 
> Isn't 2.34 the latest released version?  The plus doesn't work for
> me either.  But I see no error message.

I see 2.35 here, but that is CVS ...

> Can Stefan  be a little more specific about how this is used? 
> 
> bbdb <RET>
> some_name + some_name2 <RET>
> 
>   or
> bbdb <RET>
> Some_NAME<RET>
> 
>  + Some_NAME2 <RET>
> 
> Is another `b' required?

+ should be bound to bbdb-append-records ...

In the BBDB-buffer:
/ somename1 RET
+
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Harry Putnam | 22 May 2003 19:22
Favicon

Re: Add records to a search?

bbdb <at> robf.de writes:

> In the BBDB-buffer:
> / somename1 RET
> +
> / somename2 RET

Is the forward slash a special binding you've made?  I see no such
keybinding. 

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Robert Fenk | 23 May 2003 11:04
Picon

Re: Add records to a search?

On Thursday, May 22, 2003 at 10:22:33, Harry Putnam wrote:
> bbdb <at> robf.de writes:
> 
> > In the BBDB-buffer:
> > / somename1 RET
> > +
> > / somename2 RET
> 
> Is the forward slash a special binding you've made?  I see no such
> keybinding. 

It is bound by bbdb-vm.el in VM and so I also bound it in
the bbdb-mode-map to 'bbdb ... though I have not been aware 
of this as its bound for years now ... so the safest way to
express this is:

M-x bbdb somename1 RET
M-x bbdb-append-records RET
M-x bbdb somename2 RET

;c)

Bye Robert.

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Robert Fenk | 23 May 2003 11:26
Picon

Re: Add records to a search?

On Friday, May 23, 2003 at 11:04:51, Robert Fenk wrote:
> On Thursday, May 22, 2003 at 10:22:33, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > bbdb <at> robf.de writes:
> > 
> > > In the BBDB-buffer:
> > > / somename1 RET
> > > +
> > > / somename2 RET
> > 
> > Is the forward slash a special binding you've made?  I see no such
> > keybinding. 
> 
> It is bound by bbdb-vm.el in VM and so I also bound it in
> the bbdb-mode-map to 'bbdb ... though I have not been aware 
> of this as its bound for years now ... so the safest way to
> express this is:

After really doing it ... ;c)

M-x bbdb RET somename1 RET
M-x bbdb-append-records RET
M-x bbdb RET somename2 RET

Cheers Robert

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Bjørn-Helge Mevik | 22 May 2003 19:24

Re: Add records to a search?

bbdb <at> robf.de writes:

> On Thursday, May 22, 2003 at 08:28:28, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> bhs2 <at> mevik.net (Bjørn-Helge Mevik) writes:
>> 
>> > Hm.  + is undefined in my bbdb.  I'm running 2.34.  Guess I better
>> > upgrade.
[...]
> + should be bound to bbdb-append-records ...

I found bbdb-append-records in bbdb-com.el of 2.35, but it doesn't
seem to exist in 2.34.  Guess I better upgrade. :-)

--

-- 
Bjørn-Helge Mevik

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane