24 Mar 2005 01:47
Mailing lists...
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org>
2005-03-24 00:47:40 GMT
2005-03-24 00:47:40 GMT
Hello, I have now got all the mailing lists at gnu.org together and will configure them in the next few days. After thinking this over, I have decided that I shall attempt to transfer all the subscriptions myself. There are a few problems with this approach: I am not actually the list owner of the AUCTeX mailing list (or if I am, I don't know how to make use of it), but the moderator. I can get the subscription list, but I don't think I can change it. I'll probably try writing a script that will subscribe and unsubscribe everyone by sending the respective mails to the list managing software. This will mean that you will get mails and have to reconfirm both your unsubscription as well as your subscription. I'll only transfer the auc-tex list, though: I think that few people are actually subscribed to the preview-latex-only lists without being subscribed to AUCTeX as well. I'll redirect the preview-latex-bugs list to bug-auctex, and the preview-latex-devel list to auctex-devel. I think it would make sense to remove the preview-related groups from gmane altogether: they are already archived at Sourceforge, and people that look into the then stagnant gmane groups might get the wrong impression that the project has died. Of course, not finding any preview-latex specific group any more might lead to a similar conclusion. Sigh. Maybe one can have a group that only contains a single article pointing to where one should look instead? I think Reiner might manage telling the Gmane people what groups to create and how: he certainly has shown the largest amount of clue(Continue reading)



> However, the search capabilities on search.gmane.org are very limited,
> so in case I am searching for older messages and need more
> flexibility, I use rain.gmane.org instead. Hopefully this will become
> the regular search soon.
ACK.
>> bug-auctex gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs Bug reports on AUCTeX
>
> Better "Bug reports for AUCTeX"?
Yes.
>> auctex-commit gmane.emacs.auctex.commits Commits to the AUCTeX repository (read-only)
>> auctex-diffs gmane.emacs.auctex.cvs AUCTeX commit messages (read-only)
>
> Hm, Emacs has gmane.emacs.cvs for commit notifications (emacs-commit
> mailing list) and gmane.emacs.diffs for commits with diffs
> (emacs-diffs mailing list). This doesn't seem to be handled uniformly


> it would make sense to also choose the same categories. And when in
> doubt, we should keep closer to Emacs than Gnus as our primary
> association.
>
> So while I don't feel strongly about this, I think that the Emacs
> scheme is slightly nicer.
I've requested the groups as suggested above on Gmane.
If possible, could you add "Mail-Followup-To: auctex-devel <at> gnu.org"
header to the lists?
RSS Feed