15 Mar 2006 09:16
Re: Suggested change to round timestamps.
Thomas Baumann <thomas.baumann <at> ch.tum.de>
2006-03-15 08:16:51 GMT
2006-03-15 08:16:51 GMT
Useful, maybe, for accounting purposes, in this case, the calculation of the timespan in between could be extended to compute and insert a rounded value. For other purposes I would stay with the exact value (which of course is still possible in Alex version), well, this is my personal opinion. Thomas Carsten Dominik <dominik <at> science.uva.nl> writes: > Ah, Alex, > > yes, thank you for this reminder. Alex did sent me that patch before. > I remember that I did like the idea but did not put it in because > there are more places in the code that dead with time stamps and that > would also have to be modified. So some work would be needed, right > now I don't know how much out of the top of my head. > > More people who would find this useful? > > - Carsten > > > On Mar 14, 2006, at 0:43, Alex Bochannek wrote: > >> When I first started using Org-mode to keep track of events during the >> day, I found the timestamp function extremely handy. I didn't want to >> keep time to the minute, but round to, e.g., fifteen minute intervals. >>(Continue reading)
>> For other purposes I would stay with the exact value (which of course
>> is still possible in Alex version)
>
> Likewise, I would stay with the exact value but still like the idea of
> being able to do something different.
I tried to change it in a way that would not affect the existing
functionality. I also looked at all the calls to current-time (in the
4.01 version I started with) and only modified the ones that were
relevant. I did not look at 4.09/4.10 yet.
Alex.
RSS Feed