jidanni | 10 Nov 2010 21:15

[emacs-w3m:11413] ugly messages, lots of .gif mentions, or just [img]

Reading this message in gnus/emacs-w3m, no matter if as text (lots of
lines mentioning .gifs) or as HTML (so few links to click, all just
[img]), the results are bad.

$ apt-show-versions $ <at> 
emacs-snapshot/sid uptodate 1:20101030-1
w3m/unstable uptodate 0.5.2-10
w3m-el-snapshot/unstable uptodate 1.4.400+0.20100725-1

From: 中華民國文化研究學會 CSA <csa.taiwan <at> msa.hinet.net>
Subject: NO.109_文化研究月報一O九期
Date: 2010-11-02 05:58:46 GMT

(Continue reading)

Katsumi Yamaoka | 11 Nov 2010 00:35

[emacs-w3m:11415] Re: ugly messages, lots of .gif mentions, or just [img]

In [emacs-w3m : No.11413] jidanni <at> jidanni.org wrote:
> Reading this message in gnus/emacs-w3m, no matter if as text (lots of
> lines mentioning .gifs) or as HTML (so few links to click, all just
> [img]), the results are bad.

The html message you attached looks like the one that shr.el,
not emacs-w3m, rendered.  You can change the value of
`mm-text-html-renderer' from `shr' to `w3m' or something.
Otherwise go to the ding list please.  But shr.el is basically
a "*Simple* Html Renderer", so there is a limit from being too
much complicated (like emacs-w3m ;-), I think.

Katsumi Yamaoka | 11 Nov 2010 00:41

[emacs-w3m:11416] Re: ugly messages, lots of .gif mentions, or just [img]

In [emacs-w3m : No.11415] Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> The html message you attached looks like the one that shr.el,
> not emacs-w3m, rendered.

Oops, I was half asleep.  Please ignore my last message.

jidanni | 11 Nov 2010 01:04

[emacs-w3m:11417] Re: ugly messages, lots of .gif mentions, or just [img]

Indeed it was shr. This
  (setq mm-text-html-renderer 'w3m) ; better than even gnus-w3m
fixed it. Thanks.


2010/10/25 109