zhangguoqiang | 1 Apr 10:55
Picon

Re: Re: Solicitation for a discussion on Keyword-based addressing

The dispute is inevitable. But policy issues don't prevent domain names from being widely used, and it should not prevent keyword as well.  
 
 
2009-04-01
zhangguoqiang
发件人: Stephane Bortzmeyer
发送时间: 2009-04-01  16:48:32
收件人: zhangguoqiang
抄送: apps-discuss; YAO Jiankang
主题: Re: Solicitation for a discussion on Keyword-based addressing
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:16:36AM +0800,
 zhangguoqiang  <zhangguoqiang <at> cnnic.cn > wrote 
 a message of 156 lines which said:
 
> Different from search engines, keyword-based addressing is an
> addressing technology. Based on whether a keyword is registered or
> not, the resolution result is determinstic for any given keyword, 
 
Then it will have all the problems of the domain names, including
bureaucratic registration rules, UDRP, lawyers, ICANN, etc.
 
> For example, if you are a blogger of a portal blog website,
> typically, you are assigned a URL that identifies your blog. It is
> usually composed of two parts: a domain name and an ID(typically a
> magic number). So how can you advertise your blog to your friends? 
 
tinyurl.com
 
But it is simpler to buy a domain name and redirect.
 
> So, we think keyword-based addressing is a very useful technique,
> especially for non-english speaking countries. Even for english
> speaking countries, the above example also illustrates its
> practicability. To internationalize this service and provide cross
> resolution capability, we highly recommend a standard being
> developped. 
 
I'm very skeptical but I'll read your draft.
 
> Our keyword-based addressing draft is available at
> specifies keyword-based addressing as a DDDS application.
 
You apparently do not mention RFC 2345 (keywords are a very old idea
which keep popping up from time to time).
Attachment (张国强(1).vcf): text/x-vcard, 286 bytes
_______________________________________________
Apps-Discuss mailing list
Apps-Discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

Gmane