Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-avt-forward-shifted-red-03.txt
Colin Perkins <csp <at> csperkins.org>
2010-01-22 15:50:38 GMT
The -04 version looks good to me.
On 21 Jan 2010, at 16:22, Qiaobing Xie wrote:
> Hi, Colin,
> Thanks for the comments. Please see my response in-line.
> Colin Perkins wrote:
>> On 5 Jan 2010, at 01:19, Tom Taylor wrote:
>>> This is to announce Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-(Continue reading)
>>> forward-shifted-red-03.txt. Subject to comments received, the Last
>>> Call period will expire on 18 January 2010.
>> I have some minor comments.
>> What are the units of the "forwardshift" media type parameter?
>> Section 3 implies that it's RTP timestamp units, whereas the
>> appendix suggests that it counts codec frames; section 4 doesn't
>> specify a unit.
> It is in RTP timestamp units. Appendix text is meant to be
> conceptual and thus using codec frames. I will improve the wording
> to remove the confusion.
>> Is the intent to define this only for audio, or for other top-level
>> media types? RFC 4102 defines text/red, but this draft has no
>> equivalent. This draft should probably register text/fwdred and
>> updated RFC4102, however if there's a good reason for only