Publication requested for draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-10

Hi,

I just requested publication of the dccp-udpencap draft. The write-up is shown below. Many thanks to Tom,
Gorry and Colin for the hard work on the draft, and of course to everyone who reviewed it along the way!

- Pasi

-------------

(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?  Why
is this the proper type of RFC?  Is this type of RFC indicated in the
title page header?

	This document is requested to be published as Proposed
	Standard. It specifies the mechanism for encapsulating DCCP headers
	in UDP datagrams, and does not outline an experiment. The type
	is properly indicated in the header.

(2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement
Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent
examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved
documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections:

Technical Summary

	The document specifies a mechanism to encapsulate DCCP packets
	in UDP datagrams, to support NAT traversal through devices
	that do not support DCCP natively. It also discusses various
	interactions related to encapsulation, such as those related