13 May 2008 11:18
Re: WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs
Roksana Boreli <Roksana.Boreli <at> nicta.com.au>
2008-05-13 09:18:30 GMT
2008-05-13 09:18:30 GMT
Positive. Considering the use with VoIP we need methods which, while being fair to TCP, also allow the application to send data when it needs to. Kind regards, Roksana -----Original Message----- From: dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phelan, Tom Sent: Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:46 PM To: dccp <at> ietf.org Subject: [dccp] WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs Hi All, In Philly, we decided to poll the mailing list for support in making draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs a working group draft (Quick Start for DCCP). So this is the poll. Please actively respond with positive, negative or don't care opinions -- I can't hear you hum around the world
. Tom P.
.
Please actively respond with positive, negative or don't care opinions
-- I can't hear you hum around the world
RSS Feed