Roksana Boreli | 13 May 2008 11:18
Picon
Favicon

Re: WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs

Positive. Considering the use with VoIP we need methods which, while
being fair to TCP, also allow the application to send data when it needs
to.  

Kind regards, Roksana

-----Original Message-----
From: dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Phelan, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:46 PM
To: dccp <at> ietf.org
Subject: [dccp] WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs

Hi All,

In Philly, we decided to poll the mailing list for support in making
draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs a working group draft (Quick Start for
DCCP).  So this is the poll :-).

Please actively respond with positive, negative or don't care opinions
-- I can't hear you hum around the world :-).

Tom P.

Ingemar Johansson S | 14 May 2008 07:23
Picon
Favicon

Re: WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs

I too believe that quickstart may be useful for VoIP. The application is
then more likely to be able to resume transmission quickly after e.g
call onhold. 
I don't however expect silence periods to be a big problem as most
speech codecs transmit comfort noise frames 2 times per second or even
more often during silence.

Regards
Ingemar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Roksana Boreli
> Sent: den 13 maj 2008 11:19
> To: Phelan, Tom
> Cc: dccp <at> ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dccp] WG status for draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-dccp-qs
> 
> Positive. Considering the use with VoIP we need methods 
> which, while being fair to TCP, also allow the application to 
> send data when it needs to.  
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards, Roksana
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:dccp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Phelan, Tom
> Sent: Wednesday, 7 May 2008 11:46 PM
(Continue reading)


Gmane