Re: RFC 3877 and IPv6

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 04:21:59PM -0600, Mark A. Flacy wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> In the version of RFC 3877 available at datatracker.ietf.org, I
> noticed that the alarmActiveVariableValueType does not include
> either InetAddressType or InetAddress in the enumeration which does
> not allow you to indicate an IPv6 address in the
> alarmActiveVariableTable.  The alarmActiveEngineAddress is expressed
> according to RFC 2851, so that is not a problem.
> 
> Will alarmActiveVariableValueType be extended to include
> InetAddressType and InetAddress (along with matching
> alarmActiveVariableInetAddressTypeVal and
> alarmActiveVariableInetAddressVal objects in
> AlarmActiveVariableEntry)?
> Is there a recommended work-around?

And InetAddress is encoded as an OCTET STRING and hence you should be
fine using alarmActiveVariableOctetStringVal (and for the
InetAddressType you would use alarmActiveVariableInteger32Val).

/js

--

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>