Forwarding and Control Element Separation (forces)

Evangelos Haleplidis | 1 Dec 2005 15:19

LFBClassID

Greetings to the list,

This is an editorial comment.

In Page 43 of the Protocol draft, the FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned
to the value of 0x01.
"The FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x1."

In Appendix B of the Protocol draft page 80 the FE LFB is assigned the
value of 0x02.

In Page 82 of the Model draft, the FE Object LFB Class ID is assigned to
the value of 0x01.
"This LFB will have a class, FEObject.  The LFBClassID for this class is 1."

Two corrective actions are needed:

1. Page 80 of the Protocol draft:
"FE LFB" should be changed to "FE Object LFB" for clarification reasons.

2. Page 82 of the Model draft:
"The LFBClassID for this class is 1." should be changed to "The LFBClassID
of the FE Object LFB is assigned the value of 0x02".

Regards,

Evangelos Haleplidis.

headers

Jamal Hadi Salim | 1 Dec 2005 16:34

Re: LFBClassID

Please open a tracker entry for this so the person editing doesnt miss
it.

cheers,
jamal

On Thu, 2005-01-12 at 16:19 +0200, Evangelos Haleplidis wrote:
> Greetings to the list,
> 
> This is an editorial comment.
> 
> In Page 43 of the Protocol draft, the FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned
> to the value of 0x01.
> "The FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x1."
> 
> In Appendix B of the Protocol draft page 80 the FE LFB is assigned the
> value of 0x02.
> 
> In Page 82 of the Model draft, the FE Object LFB Class ID is assigned to
> the value of 0x01.
> "This LFB will have a class, FEObject.  The LFBClassID for this class is 1."
> 
> Two corrective actions are needed:
> 
> 1. Page 80 of the Protocol draft:
> "FE LFB" should be changed to "FE Object LFB" for clarification reasons.
> 
> 2. Page 82 of the Model draft:
> "The LFBClassID for this class is 1." should be changed to "The LFBClassID
> of the FE Object LFB is assigned the value of 0x02".

(Continue reading)

headers

Weiming Wang | 1 Dec 2005 16:28

Re: LFBClassID

Hi Evangelos,

Thank you again for the review. I think it will be fixed by the protocol and the
model for the consistency.

thanks,
weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: "Evangelos Haleplidis" <ehalep <at> ee.upatras.gr>
Subject: LFBClassID

> Greetings to the list,
>
> This is an editorial comment.
>
> In Page 43 of the Protocol draft, the FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned
> to the value of 0x01.
> "The FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x1."
>
> In Appendix B of the Protocol draft page 80 the FE LFB is assigned the
> value of 0x02.
>
> In Page 82 of the Model draft, the FE Object LFB Class ID is assigned to
> the value of 0x01.
> "This LFB will have a class, FEObject.  The LFBClassID for this class is 1."
>
> Two corrective actions are needed:
>
> 1. Page 80 of the Protocol draft:
> "FE LFB" should be changed to "FE Object LFB" for clarification reasons.

(Continue reading)