I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html> ).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-bfd-05
Reviewer: Avshalom Houri
Review Date: 2009-07-02
IETF LC End Date: 2009-07-02
IESG Telechat date: (if known) --

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

Line 480
  This precedence order prioritizes superset of functionality and
  simplicity of encapsulation.
- Hard to understand what the sentence means.

Nits/editorial comments:

line 259:
  the scope of this specification, and is instead defined in
- Word "instead" is probably redundant.

Line 287:
     within the rage 49152 through 65535.  The IP Protocol Number and
- rage -> range

Line 378
  see Table 1 in in Section 3.
- in in -> in

Line 440
      continue using it until such time as the PW is re-signaled.  In
- Probably should be:
      continue using it until when the PW is re-signaled.  In

Line 466
  the order lowest list number CV Type to highest list number CV Type,
- Should be:
  the order of the lowest list number CV Type to the highest list number CV Type,

--Avshalom