RE: Requesting our ADs to close our HUBMIB WG

There are a couple of ways this could happen. The IEEE 802.3 Working
group may decide to continue to work on Ethernet MIB modules same as
IEEE 802.1 has now taken over and continues the former Bridge MIB work,
there are some discussions on this respect with the IEEE 802.3 chair.
Limited scope updates could be worked also in the OPSAWG. Actually I
would suggest to leave the list open for a while for such discussions. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Beili [mailto:EdwardB <at> actelis.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:43 PM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Subject: RE: [Hubmib] Requesting our ADs to close our HUBMIB WG
> 
> What would happen if there is a need to update one of the 
> HUBMIB-edited RFCs or add a new one?
> Is it possible to re-open the WG? Who would be the person to 
> ask for it?
> Regards,
> -E.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen <at> alcatel-lucent.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 15:31
> > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > Cc: rbonica <at> juniper.net
> > Subject: [Hubmib] Requesting our ADs to close our HUBMIB WG
> > 
> > Since no-one objected to the proposal to now close our WG,