3 Apr 02:41
Re: Re: 7 bits forever!
James Seng <jseng <at> pobox.org.sg>
2002-04-03 00:41:44 GMT
2002-04-03 00:41:44 GMT
And you miss the point completely too. IETF move forward with draft. Repeatively say "i want utf-8, i want it now" after the first time are just noise. Write your draft. It is make sense, then support will come. -James Seng > I think you missed the point completely. The point, as Keld have mentioned > is that there are people, who believes that it is beneficial to have UTF8 > option, I being one of them and Keld being one of them, and it is a fact > that cannot be ignored and should not be ignored. From my interpretation of > your previous words, you also believe that it is beneficial to go beyond > ASCII. That, is my point and please dont try to confuse the message with > the means! Human language is not machine language and you have to > understand the context before you can get the message. If you cant > understand this simple depth and intricacy of human interaction and > communication, I cant help you. > > The exercise is to establish a meaningful support before I waste my time > working on a draft if no one wants to talk about it. > I have a draft of a draft inplace for UDNA, and I am updating it as we > continue to discuss some of the elements of it on the list. I think it > makes more sense this way, than to throw something in here fresh. Also I > think it would be beneficial to have a draft on IDNX (IDN Transition). So > please stop distrupting the discussion of a good discussion here. >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed