Re: URL encoding in html page

At 10:27 PM 4/2/2002 -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
>Again, I was commenting exclusively on the tactic of trying to
>cut off discussion by making over-broad assertions about what
>the IETF does or does not permit groups to do, what charters
>prohibit,

Over-broad?  OK.  Then consider responding to the specifics I provided.

>  etc.   I mentioned the keyword BOF because there
>seemed to be to be a pattern and it illustrated the pattern.

"Pattern?" Do you mean the pattern of your objecting when you do not agree 
with a citation of IETF practise?

Alas, John, in the IETF the plebeians are allowed to know and contribute to 
management discussions.  Some of us even have quite a bit of experience 
writing IETF process specifications, being area directors, and/or chairing 
working groups.  Consequently, quite a few of us know quite a bit about 
IETF practise.  And we are allowed to cite that knowledge.  (Feel free to 
cite rules to the contrary.)

>   But the formal
>determination of relevance is a WG Chair or AD problem.

Formal determination?  Glad you included the word formal.  Your objection 
was not to my making a formal determination, since I did not make a formal 
determination.

So we are left with your again citing a point that is not relevant.