Comprehensive WG LC review of draft-ietf-eai-simpledowngrade-05 and draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-06

Hi.  

The other two reviews are attached.  Depending on what the
authors and WG have to say, I hope to have the Shepherd's
reports and requests to initiate IETF LC in Pete's hands before
I leave for Vancouver.   The Last Call can't actually be started
until new documents are posted, but I hope that can happen a
week from today.

happy reading,
   john

draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade-06.txt

In-depth review comments (trivial editorial/typographic
comments ignored)...

(1) Abstract

"... (SMTPUTF8) extension..." should probably be "...
(SMTPUTF8) extension to SMTP..."  and "treat" in the last
sentence might better be "process" or something equivalent.

(2) If you are going to ask that the change history (now
Section 10) be removed, please make it Appendix B.  Doing so
will make it easier for all concerned and, in particular, make
comparison of the last I-D with the AUTH48 version somewhat
easier. 

(3) Section 1.1, first sentence