Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Straw consensus call on auth-header draft

At 14:29 12-10-2008, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>I'd like to do a more explicit consensus call now to nail this 
>down.  I've tried to identify the major points of attraction rather 
>than every variant, to see where people are leaning.   Please reply 
>with one of these options, a variant, and explanation if you like:
>
>A)  auth-header to not require any feature advertising or auto-configuration

I'm for (A).

>B) auth-header to normatively RECOMMEND some kind of feature advertising
>C) auth-header to normatively REQUIRE some kind of feature advertising

I gather that you are referring to advertising for the MUA through 
POP3 and IMAP.

>Separately, the unspecified feature advertising or auto-conf should 
>be (choose one or more):
>1) IMAP Capabilities advertising
>2) E/SMTP capabilities
>3) IMAP annotations
>4) Something else
>5) Nothing

I'm for (5).

Regards,
-sm