Internet Message Access Protocol Extension (imapext)

Lyndon Nerenberg | 8 Feb 2012 19:33

Metadata (5654) Implementation Limits


[I didn't get much response from the imap-protocol list, so I'm trying here, too.]

I'm curious to know what the implementation limits are on servers that support the Metadata extension.  I
would appreciate it if the server authors out there could take a minute to fill out this survey.

I will send a summary to the list once the responses trickle off. (If you want your results to be anonymous,
say so in the comments.)

Thanks,

--lyndon

Implementation name and version:
Do you support /private?:
Do you support /private/vendor?:
Do you support unsolicited Metadata responses without values?:
Do you support unsolicited Metadata responses with values?:
Maximum number of annotations per mailbox:
Maximum size of an <entry>:
Maximum size of a <value>:
Maximum depth supported in <entries>:
Other comments:

headers

Greg Banks | 8 Feb 2012 21:18

Re: Metadata (5654) Implementation Limits


On 09/02/2012, at 5:33, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon <at> orthanc.ca> wrote:

>
> [I didn't get much response from the imap-protocol list, so I'm  
> trying here, too.]
>
> I'm curious to know what the implementation limits are on servers  
> that support the Metadata extension.  I would appreciate it if the  
> server authors out there could take a minute to fill out this survey.
>
> I will send a summary to the list once the responses trickle off.  
> (If you want your results to be anonymous, say so in the comments.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> --lyndon
>
> Implementation name and version:

Cyrus (METADATA support rewritten and ANNOTATE support added to future  
2.5 release).

> Do you support /private?:

Yes

> Do you support /private/vendor?:

Yes, with a subset of that space reserved for the server itself. Users

(Continue reading)