headers
Eric Klein | 14 Nov 2008 10:10
Picon

Re: Fwd: Combine WGs for NAT66 discussion re internet area open meeting agenda

Hi Jari,
 
Thanks, holding it in BEHAVE is fine provided that everyone with a vested interest participates. Otherwise we will continue to have the same problem.
 
Eric

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko <at> piuha.net> wrote:
Eric,


As the NAT66 discussion seems to be happening in several WGs at once, it seems to me (and Tim) that you should try to hold some sort of joint meeting in INT-AREA to get some sort of consensus yes or no for NAT in v6 or at least to do a gap analysis
 Current Groups working on it are v6OPS, BEHAVE, Softwires, RRG, and now v6.

We considered this, but at the end decided that its better to keep the biggest nat66 discussion in one place, and that is going to be BEHAVE. They have enough time for it, and many people will be attending. I hope people from this list will, too.

I am aware that there will be some other discussions as well. It might be that a full BOF next time might the best place to make decisions.

Jari


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane