2 Mar 2006 22:42
Re: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-ipoib-connected-mode
H.K. Jerry Chu <Jerry.Chu <at> eng.sun.com>
2006-03-02 21:42:40 GMT
2006-03-02 21:42:40 GMT
[Cc'ing the IPoIB list for more comments.] >Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 16:23:53 +0100 >From: Brian E Carpenter <brc <at> zurich.ibm.com> > >This certainly a classical problem with LFNs and at least >in some cases IB may look like an LFN. I agree with Allison Not sure about the "L" part. IB is high-bandwidth but "low-latency". >that this needs to be stated better. (In fact, people using >this sort of technology for real firehose applications are >often TCP-averse for this reason.) > > Brian > >Allison Mankin wrote: >> Discuss: >> The IB folks won't be surprised by my popping up with this :) That's right. It's been overdue :) >> >> The RC mode of InfiniBand guarantees in-order delivery of >> packets. Every message transmitted over the RC connection is >> broken into physical MTU sized packets by the RC connection. If >> any packet is lost, it is retransmitted until the complete >> message is exchanged. Therefore, there is a possibility of a >> reliable transport layer, such as TCP, retransmitting due to a(Continue reading)
RSS Feed