23 Mar 2006 07:58
RE: small change in the connected mode draft
Dror Goldenberg <gdror <at> mellanox.co.il>
2006-03-23 06:58:01 GMT
2006-03-23 06:58:01 GMT
I think that this is reasonable amendment. Being practical, I don't think that IPoIB-CM will be widely used over WANs or long latency fabrics. To me it looks something very data center oriented, something like Jumbo frames in Ethernet. Other than that, IB is mostly a lossless fabric, so I wouldn't expect to see that many of retransmissions in RC anyway. Dror > -----Original Message----- > From: H.K. Jerry Chu [mailto:Jerry.Chu <at> eng.sun.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:05 AM > To: ipoverib <at> ietf.org > Cc: margaret <at> thingmagic.com; bill <at> strahm.net; mankin <at> psg.com > Subject: [Ipoverib] small change in the connected mode draft > > > Hi folks, > > Allison Mankin, the transport area AD who brought up some > concern during IESG review of the connected draft regarding > simultaneous retransmissions at different layers, has > suggested and Vivek agreed to the following change to section > 7.1 "A Cautionary Note on IPoIB-RC". > > The revised section reads like this: > > The RC mode of InfiniBand guarantees in-order delivery of > packets. Every message transmitted over the RC connection is(Continue reading)
RSS Feed