Re: Pages for documents

Hi,

Thanks Mike and Pete - elegant solution w/ "document" prefix.

I think keeping PWG flat namespace is important.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic <at> gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Zehler, Peter <Peter.Zehler <at> xerox.com> wrote:
> I have no objection to “document-pages”, “document-pages-completed”, and
> “document-pages=completed-current-copy”.  I will make the changes to the
> schema and the PJT specification.  (I can always change back if there is
> stiff opposition.)
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Zehler
>
> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler <at> Xerox.com
> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>
>
>
> From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet <at> apple.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:10 PM
> To: Zehler, Peter
> Cc: <ipp <at> pwg.org>
> Subject: Re: [IPP] Pages for documents
>
>
>
> Pete,
>
>
>
> I think we should change the JPS3 name to prevent the collision. In this
> case it isn't a problem for the registry, but I can see this causing
> confusion in the future.
>
>
>
> I propose adding a "document-" prefix to the "pages-[suffix]" Document
> Description attributes (e.g. "pages" becomes "document-pages", etc.) to
> mirror the "job-" prefix used for the corresponding Job Description
> attributes.
>
>
>
> Any objections?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 18, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Zehler, Peter wrote:
>
>
>
> All,
>
> Does anyone see any problem with us no longer having a flat namespace in the
> PWG model?  In my final JPS3 edits I found a collision on “pages”.  JPS3 has
> the “pages”  element whose semantics is the number of input pages and a
> syntax of integer.  The “overrides” element already contains the “pages”
> element whose semantics is to identifies one or more output pages and it is
> of type RangeOfInt.
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Zehler
>
> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler <at> Xerox.com
> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp <at> pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp <at> pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>

--

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp <at> pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp