Re: CLARIFICATION: language about copyright notices

Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> 
> --On 20. november 2006 04:42 -0500 Scott W Brim <sbrim <at> cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> Excerpts from Harald Alvestrand on Mon, Nov 20, 2006 05:30:54AM +0100:
>>
>>> - If someone believes that a consensus stated in this list does not
>>> represent a consensus of the working group, please state so to the list
>>> in  a note with the subject line "DISCUSS:" and the name of the issue.
>>> If two  people agree that an item needs discussion, the issue will be
>>> open for  discussion on the list. We may also assign it an issue number
>>> in the  tracker.
>>
>>
>> Clarification comes before discussion ...
>>
>>> 5) Language about copyright notices
>>> Wordsmithed result: "Documents should not contain text that seems to
>>> restrict the IETF-granted rights to use the documents". Such text may be
>>> license text or copyright text beyond the standard IETF text.
>>
>>
>> How does this interact with rfc3978 section 5.2 (derivative works
>> limitation in status)?
> 
> 
> This was in the minutes, but perhaps not too clear.
> 
> In a separate item: the WG thinks that NDW documents are useful, and