Yaron Sheffer | 30 Jun 2012 14:07
Picon

IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items

Hi,

According to the draft agenda, the working group will be meeting in Vancouver on Tuesday afternoon. Please let Paul and I know if you would like a presentation slot. As usual, we expect any technical presentation to be based on an Internet draft.

Thanks,
    Yaron
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
Paul Hoffman | 16 Jul 2012 20:35

Re: IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items

Here is the proposed agenda; let us know if you think it should be different.

Greetings, note well, blue sheets:  5 min
draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem: 60 min
draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp: 15 min

--Paul Hoffman
Paul Wouters | 16 Jul 2012 21:18
Picon

Re: IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Here is the proposed agenda; let us know if you think it should be different.
>
> Greetings, note well, blue sheets:  5 min
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem: 60 min
> draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp: 15 min

Should we add an item for:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-00 ?

Paul
Paul Hoffman | 16 Jul 2012 22:23

Re: IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items

On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
>> Here is the proposed agenda; let us know if you think it should be different.
>> 
>> Greetings, note well, blue sheets:  5 min
>> draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem: 60 min
>> draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp: 15 min
> 
> Should we add an item for:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-00 ?

There has been no discussion of the draft since the last meeting, and none of the authors asked for a slot, so I
didn't schedule it initially. Do either of the authors have something relevant to say in the meeting?

--Paul Hoffman
Tero Kivinen | 18 Jul 2012 20:56
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items

Paul Hoffman writes:
> On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >> Here is the proposed agenda; let us know if you think it should be different.
> >> Greetings, note well, blue sheets:  5 min
> >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem: 60 min
> >> draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp: 15 min
> > 
> > Should we add an item for:
> > 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-00 ?
> 
> There has been no discussion of the draft since the last meeting,
> and none of the authors asked for a slot, so I didn't schedule it
> initially. Do either of the authors have something relevant to say
> in the meeting? 

We had some discussion in the last IETF, but we did got cut a bit
short in the presentation with the problems with power...

Anyways, I think the question is most likely what are we going to do
with the old Raw RSA certificate type and that also affects whether we
should be standard track or not.

I think more people in the present in the WG meeting preferred to just
obsolete the old format, but this is something that should be
confirmed on the list.

I have been bit too busy lately to be able to work on this, but I will
try to get this one going forward too. 
--

-- 
kivinen <at> iki.fi
Paul Hoffman | 18 Jul 2012 21:43

Re: IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items

On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:

> Paul Hoffman writes:
>> On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> Here is the proposed agenda; let us know if you think it should be different.
>>>> Greetings, note well, blue sheets:  5 min
>>>> draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem: 60 min
>>>> draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp: 15 min
>>> 
>>> Should we add an item for:
>>> 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-00 ?
>> 
>> There has been no discussion of the draft since the last meeting,
>> and none of the authors asked for a slot, so I didn't schedule it
>> initially. Do either of the authors have something relevant to say
>> in the meeting? 
> 
> We had some discussion in the last IETF, but we did got cut a bit
> short in the presentation with the problems with power...
> 
> Anyways, I think the question is most likely what are we going to do
> with the old Raw RSA certificate type and that also affects whether we
> should be standard track or not.
> 
> I think more people in the present in the WG meeting preferred to just
> obsolete the old format, but this is something that should be
> confirmed on the list.
> 
> I have been bit too busy lately to be able to work on this, but I will
> try to get this one going forward too. 

You did not answer the question of "Do either of the authors have something relevant to say in the meeting?".
If something has not been discussed on the list in three or four months, I'm not sure what the value of doing
so in the meeting is.

--Paul Hoffman

Gmane