Re: IPsecME meeting - call for agenda items
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman <at> vpnc.org>
2012-07-18 19:43:06 GMT
On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Paul Hoffman writes:
>> On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> Here is the proposed agenda; let us know if you think it should be different.
>>>> Greetings, note well, blue sheets: 5 min
>>>> draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem: 60 min
>>>> draft-nir-ipsecme-ike-tcp: 15 min
>>> Should we add an item for:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-00 ?
>> There has been no discussion of the draft since the last meeting,
>> and none of the authors asked for a slot, so I didn't schedule it
>> initially. Do either of the authors have something relevant to say
>> in the meeting?
> We had some discussion in the last IETF, but we did got cut a bit
> short in the presentation with the problems with power...
> Anyways, I think the question is most likely what are we going to do
> with the old Raw RSA certificate type and that also affects whether we
> should be standard track or not.
> I think more people in the present in the WG meeting preferred to just
> obsolete the old format, but this is something that should be
> confirmed on the list.
> I have been bit too busy lately to be able to work on this, but I will
> try to get this one going forward too.
You did not answer the question of "Do either of the authors have something relevant to say in the meeting?".
If something has not been discussed on the list in three or four months, I'm not sure what the value of doing
so in the meeting is.