Re: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509

I'm cc'ing kitten, since the IANA registry in question is nominally a gssapi, not a kerberos one.

Your comment about the underscore is interesting.  Since we're documenting an existing protocol, the
underscore is what it is.  Should we resolve the issue by requesting an exception, or by deleting the
request for an addition to the registry?

I'd prefer an exception, but I'm OK either way.

On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:30 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've done my 5742 review of this and reckon that its doesn't
> conflict with the planned work on the topic in the kerberos
> WG, so I've put this on the June 21st IESG telechat agenda
> for the other ADs to see if they agree or not.
> 
> Note that I also had some comments on the text itself. [1]
> The authors/ISE might want to take a look at those in the
> meantime, in particular the IANA registration comment.
> (Authors - I think the right thing here is to do what the
> ISE wants in terms of any possible revisions, but from
> the IESG point of view, I'd guess changes you might want
> to make to address those comments if made in the next week
> wouldn't be a problem.)
> 
> Cheers,
> Stephen.
>