12 Jun 2003 05:25
Re: a question
Vipin Jain <vipinietf <at> yahoo.com>
2003-06-12 03:25:08 GMT
2003-06-12 03:25:08 GMT
kchen, I'd encourage your to send L2TP tunnel switching related questions to L2TP list, because this is the right forum for such discussions. my response inline.. --- kchen <kchen <at> seu.edu.cn> wrote: > Hi,I have a question to ask you. > [L2] <--- PPP ---> [LAC] <---L2TP --> [ TSA ] <--- PPTP---> [LNS] > In such a example,the TSA should dencrypt the packet from LAC and encrypt it > to LNS,is it?if this is true,I think the TSA is a bottleneck. you are correct, TSA would be bottleneck specially if encryption and decription is done in software; In general, if one uses TSA that can't handle traffic (control as well as data) from multiple LACs then there is some problem in the network delpoyment. > [L2] <--- PPP ---> [LAC] <---L2TP --> [ TSA ] <--- L2TP---> [LNS] > In this situation,the tunnel beside the TSA are both L2TP.The packet is > forward to LNS directly.Is it true? nope.. the packet needs to switch the session and tunnel so it can't be forwarded directo to the LNS; It must be destined to TSA's tunnel IP address, which could decide to tunnel the session or drop it depending on configured policies. thanks, -- vipin > Thank you fore you help. >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed