Re: UNGEGN definitions and UNICODe Glossary of terms

I thought it had already been established that:

1.  our terminology is largely consistent with UNGEGN (except that we 
don't classify certain types of scripts as "defective"), so we have no 
changes to make there, and

2.  neither LTRU nor ietf-languages is responsible for either the 
French-language title of ISO 639 nor the decision to include sign 
languages in the scope of that standard (though we agree with that 
decision), so we have no changes to make there either.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages <at> alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages