Addison Phillips | 9 Feb 2008 02:10
Picon
Favicon

Re: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis

 > After consulting with our document editors,

I don't recall seeing a note from you recently, but I'll go back and 
look for it. Shouldn't I submit draft-12, with its one or two edits first?

Addison

-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> After consulting with our document editors, my co-chair, and our
> Area Director, as ltru co-chair I'm pleased to announce the start
> of working group last call on two documents:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-11.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-4645bis-04.txt
> 
> This will be a two-week WG last call, ending on February 22.
> In order to maintain some semblance of sanity PLEASE:
>    1) group your *purely* editorial comments into a single message
>    2) technical comments should be posted with *ONE* issue per message
>    3) the subject line should identify the document (e.g. 4646bis)
>    4) the subject line should uniquely identify the issue
(Continue reading)

Randy Presuhn | 9 Feb 2008 02:35
Picon

Re: Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis

Hi -

> From: "Addison Phillips" <addison <at> yahoo-inc.com>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn <at> mindspring.com>
> Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru <at> ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 5:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Begin LTRU WG last call on 4646bis and 4645bis
>
> > After consulting with our document editors,
> 
> I don't recall seeing a note from you recently, but I'll go back and 
> look for it.

A short while ago I received a NDN for you.  Sorry, I assumed you'd
seen our conversation.

> Shouldn't I submit draft-12, with its one or two edits first?

No.  If it's just one or two (or even a small handful of) edits,
let's treat them individually as WGLC comments.

Randy


Gmane