Re: MLDv2 router in the presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners
K.Kawaguchi <kawaguti <at> ysknet.co.jp>
2010-09-28 06:42:51 GMT
Hi Indranil-san, Kunal-san,
Thank you for the answers.
I understood.
> Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a
> possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present
> in the LAN, this will not be acceptable.
Best Regards
--
Kiyoaki Kawaguchi
"Indranil Bhattacharya <myselfindranil <at> gmail.com>" wrote:
>
> Hi Kiyoaki Kawaguchi,
>
> Yes, I would think so. Otherwise there is a
> possibility of some sources getting deleted. When MLDv1 receiver is present
> in the LAN, this will not be acceptable.
>
> Thanks,
> Indranil
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM, K.Kawaguchi <kawaguti <at> ysknet.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a simple question for MLDv2 interoperation with MLDv1.
> >
> >
> > RFC3810
> > ---
> > 8.3. Multicast Router Behavior
> >
> > 8.3.2. In the Presence of MLDv1 Multicast Address Listeners
> >
> > MLDv2 BLOCK messages are ignored, as are source-lists in TO_EX()
> > messages (i.e., any TO_EX() message is treated as TO_EX( {} )). On
> > the other hand, the Querier continues to send MLDv2 queries,
> > regardless of its Multicast Address Compatibility Mode.
> > ---
> >
> >
> > Is the follwing a correct right too?
> >
> > "Any IS_EX() message is treated as IS_EX( {} )."
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > --
> > Kiyoaki Kawaguchi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > magma mailing list
> > magma <at> ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
> >
>
>
>
>
>