Re: security recommendations in MIDCOM MIB draft

On 2007-7-4, at 9:43, ext Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> So, I am not sure that I see the problem. The MIDCOM MIB document  
> seems
> to be OK in adopting a strict secure mode SNMPv3 requirement.

There is not a problem then. I just wanted to make sure that the  
MIDCOM MIB doesn't make statements it shouldn't make.

> If we need
> to discuss a change in the security considerations for other MIB
> documents we should discuss this separately.

No, that's not what this was about.

Thanks!

Lars

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom