2 Sep 2004 20:23
RE: New issue 18: Threat discussion
<Atul.Sharma <at> nokia.com>
2004-09-02 18:23:32 GMT
2004-09-02 18:23:32 GMT
Hi Pasi, Why are we in MOBIKE trying to solve "transient pseudo-NAT" attack? The problem is of general nature, and will impact IP, IPsec traffic as much as (MOB)IKE traffic. Any solution to this attack has to be of general nature rather than MOBIKE-specific solution just working for MOBIKE. Just trying to understand.... Best, Atul > -----Original Message----- > From: mobike-bounces <at> machshav.com > [mailto:mobike-bounces <at> machshav.com]On > Behalf Of ext > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 11:30 AM > To: mobike <at> machshav.com > Subject: [Mobike] New issue 18: Threat discussion > > > At the San Diego meeting I promised to create a new issue > about the various threats the protocol should consider. > > So far, we have at least the following (notation: the IKE > peers are A and B; C is an innocent victim). >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed