Lyndon Nerenberg | 5 Feb 2004 07:10
Picon

Re: Please review ; Sieve Statistics and Sieve remove attachments


--On 2004-2-3 12:05 AM +0530 Madan Ganesh Velayudham 
<mganesh <at> india.hp.com> wrote:

>> Section 9:
>>
>> * Since there's no way (that I can see) to access another users
>> counter  data (through the protocol), this text doesn't seem
>> relevant.
>
> 	Yes, I agree. But to be expilicit.

It is "explicit" by reason of the specification simply not specifying 
the facility. Having the security section talk about something that 
does not exist in the protocol is just going to confuse people. The 
text in question needs to be removed.

Madan Ganesh Velayudham | 5 Feb 2004 09:46
Picon

Re: Please review ; Sieve Statistics and Sieve remove attachments


Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> --On 2004-2-3 12:05 AM +0530 Madan Ganesh Velayudham 
> <mganesh <at> india.hp.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Section 9:
>>>
>>> * Since there's no way (that I can see) to access another users
>>> counter  data (through the protocol), this text doesn't seem
>>> relevant.
>>
>>
>>     Yes, I agree. But to be expilicit.
> 
> 
> It is "explicit" by reason of the specification simply not specifying 
> the facility. Having the security section talk about something that does 
> not exist in the protocol is just going to confuse people. The text in 
> question needs to be removed.
> 
> 

Yes, Lyndon. Thats a valid one. It is better not to confuse the people.
The updated draft will not have this text.

Thank You,
MG

--

-- 
  _____________________________________________________________
(Continue reading)


Gmane