Re: draft-kong-epp-cdn-dnssec-mapping-00 Submitted for Review

Hi James,

> To meet your requirement of having a domain and it's variants inherit the
> same attributes the Key Data Interface of RFC 5910 could be used.
IMO, the Key Data Interface of RFC 5910 is only designed for single domain
name. So I think it's necessary to extend the <secDNS:keyData> element (for
example < secDNS:keyData type="single/bulk">) in order to let the users
(registrars/registries) know whether the key is for single domain name or
bulk.

> The key value of the extension that you drafted is managing the DS in
bulk.
> My suggestion is to support managing the DS individually with RFC 5731 and
> RFC 5910 and to make your extension as an option for registrars that have
the
> need to manage them in bulk. It would be good to hear from the registrars
> if managing DS in bulk is needed.
Thanks for your partly positive comments. I do hope to get more comments
from the registrars. That's why I sent email on this mailing list   IMHO,
I think our extension might be useful to not only registrars but also
registries. So I do hope we can hear from more registries related on CDN
registration.

Ning

_______________________________________________
provreg mailing list
provreg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg