20 Dec 2011 22:38
Extensions in regards to NTLDs
Michael Young <michael <at> mwyoung.ca>
2011-12-20 21:38:34 GMT
2011-12-20 21:38:34 GMT
Hi all, It's been a few years since I've posted to this list and I wonder how many of us are still subscribed to it. Hopefully enough to make this question meaningful. If you are tracking the new GTLD process closely you will have noticed a requirement in the draft Registry Agreement to format any EPP extensions in I-D format. <If Registry Operator requires the use of functionality outside the base EPP RFCs, Registry Operator must document EPP extensions in Internet-Draft format following the guidelines described in RFC 3735. Registry Operator will provide and update the relevant documentation of all the EPP Objects and Extensions supported to ICANN prior to deployment.> It occurs to me that once Operators have gone to the trouble of doing this, numerous extensions may be submitted to the IETF for possibly the standards track but maybe even more commonly as informational. Here's my concern, that we will see numerous extensions with heavily overlapping purposes to solve the common problems of running and launching a TLD registry. It seems to me that it would be great to have a group of volunteers trying to rally disparate efforts to solve similar registry problems and create standardized extensions where feasible. I know we've talked about this sort of idea before around EPP extensions, but given the impending expansion of the TLD space I thought it was worth raising again.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed