Re: IDN administrative bundling

After re-reading your message I both agree and disagree depending on the domain which you consider your
point of reference.

If your point of reference is a domain with variant names then B(n) still holds for all subordinate names,
however the domain's variant labels also fit in your definition of B(w).

In this case one can change their point of reference to the parent domain, however this is somewhat
unnatural as one does not necessarily have administrative control the parent domain.

I'm not saying you are wrong, there are two distinct concepts as you describe but I believe your definitions
could use some tightening. I agree the term bundling should probably not be used to describe the latter
given its current usage.

James

On 31/03/2012, at 7:33 PM, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs <at> crankycanuck.ca> wrote:

> No, I don't. Delegations from the parent are names in a domain. They're case B(n) in what I wrote. 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan 
> Please excuse my clumsy thumbs. 
> 
> On 2012-03-31, at 7:11, James Mitchell <james.mitchell <at> ausregistry.com.au> wrote:
> 
>> You forget where the zone name also has variant names delegated from its parent zone.
>> 
>> On 31/03/2012, at 10:57 AM, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs <at> anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:24:24PM +0000, Gould, James wrote: