Black_David | 31 May 2009 22:03

STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------
Proposed Working Group: STORM (STORage Maintenance)
	Transport (TSV) Area
Proposed Charter (Draft of May 31, 2009)
-----------------------------------------------------------

Chairs:
(Continue reading)

arkady kanevsky | 2 Jun 2009 23:25
Picon

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,

The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
David Harrington | 2 Jun 2009 16:19
Picon

Re: STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Hi,

I am satisfied with the text of the charter.
The milestones look aggressive to me, but you have a better feel for
the amount of work involved. 

Thanks for the update,
David Harrington
dbharrington <at> comcast.net
ietfdbh <at> comcast.net
dharrington <at> huawei.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ips-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces <at> ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 4:03 PM
> To: storm <at> ietf.org
> Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
> Subject: [Ips] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version
> Importance: High
> 
> What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
> for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
> and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
> about to go out for wider review.
> 
> Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
> other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
> work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm
> 
> Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
> mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
> protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

arkady kanevsky | 2 Jun 2009 23:25
Picon

Re: STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,

The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
Black_David | 15 Jun 2009 20:45

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
Black_David | 15 Jun 2009 20:45

Re: STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
arkady kanevsky | 15 Jun 2009 22:32
Picon

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
I was not proposing to extend it beyond IP based protocols.
Specifically I am trying to ensure that new spec can support
TCP/MPA and SCTP. Other protocols that are not IP based
or not even Ethernet based, in my view, are outside the scope of IETF.
 
In essense, it is RDMA connection setup on top of message
based protocol. So It be done on top of TCP/MPA, or SCTP or
maybe some other message based protocols that use IP.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky



--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
Black_David | 15 Jun 2009 20:53

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David

 

From: rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
arkady kanevsky | 15 Jun 2009 22:32
Picon

Re: STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
I was not proposing to extend it beyond IP based protocols.
Specifically I am trying to ensure that new spec can support
TCP/MPA and SCTP. Other protocols that are not IP based
or not even Ethernet based, in my view, are outside the scope of IETF.
 
In essense, it is RDMA connection setup on top of message
based protocol. So It be done on top of TCP/MPA, or SCTP or
maybe some other message based protocols that use IP.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky



--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
Black_David | 15 Jun 2009 22:38

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Ok, I'll fix it.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:33 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
I was not proposing to extend it beyond IP based protocols.
Specifically I am trying to ensure that new spec can support
TCP/MPA and SCTP. Other protocols that are not IP based
or not even Ethernet based, in my view, are outside the scope of IETF.
 
In essense, it is RDMA connection setup on top of message
based protocol. So It be done on top of TCP/MPA, or SCTP or
maybe some other message based protocols that use IP.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky



--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
Black_David | 15 Jun 2009 20:53

Re: STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David

 

From: rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
Pat Thaler | 15 Jun 2009 21:17
Favicon

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Did you mean "are not based on TCP" rather than "are not based on IP"?
Arkady was asking about connection setup for SCTP which the former fits but not the latter.
 
Regards,
Pat

From: ips-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:53 AM
To: Black_David <at> emc.com; arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David

 

From: rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
Pat Thaler | 15 Jun 2009 21:17
Favicon

Re: STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Did you mean "are not based on TCP" rather than "are not based on IP"?
Arkady was asking about connection setup for SCTP which the former fits but not the latter.
 
Regards,
Pat

From: ips-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:53 AM
To: Black_David <at> emc.com; arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David

 

From: rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
Black_David | 15 Jun 2009 21:50

Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Hmm .. I read:
 
"but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP" as being motivated
by non-IP uses, e.g., InfiniBand and FC.  Arkady?

Thanks,
--David

 

From: Pat Thaler [mailto:pthaler <at> broadcom.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 3:17 PM
To: Black, David; arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org
Subject: RE: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Did you mean "are not based on TCP" rather than "are not based on IP"?
Arkady was asking about connection setup for SCTP which the former fits but not the latter.
 
Regards,
Pat

From: ips-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:53 AM
To: Black_David <at> emc.com; arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ips] [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

And here's what I just did to that bullet ...

(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end of the connection to initiate. In addition, a couple of minor changes to RDDP connection setup (based on implementation experience) are needed to generalize it for effective use with protocols that are not based on IP.

I'm about to send the result to Lars for wider review ...

Thanks,
--David

 

From: rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:rddp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black_David <at> emc.com
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:46 PM
To: arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com
Cc: imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org; storm <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

Arkady,
 
I'll beef up the bullet, but probably not with that
degree of specifics.  Thanks for pointing this out,
and I apologize for the delay in responding.

Thanks,
--David

 

From: arkady kanevsky [mailto:arkady.kanevsky <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:26 PM
To: Black, David
Cc: storm <at> ietf.org; imss <at> ietf.org; ips <at> ietf.org; rddp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rddp] STORM proposed charter - 31 May 2009 version

David,
The description of RDDP MPA bullet is too narrow.
(5) RDDP MPA: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate.

This bullet should also cover ORD/IRD negotiation as part of
connection setup. Also current RDDP connection setup is part of MPA
spec which is primarily for TCP stream markers. This bullet should provide
RDDP connection setup for both TCP and SCTP and for any message based
protocol.

How about:
(5) RDDP Connection Setup: Good support for MPI applications requires a small
update to MPA startup functionality to allow either end
of the connection to initiate. Add RDMA Read credits to RDDP Connection
        Setup. Make RDDP connection setup to be applicable for any message based
        protocols, including but not limited to TCP with MPA markers and SCTP.

I hope it is not too late to beef up this bullet.
Thanks,
Arkady

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:03 PM, <Black_David <at> emc.com> wrote:
What I believe is the final draft of the proposed charter
for the STORM WG is attached; I've done a bunch of editing
and added the info about T10 and T11 doc access.  This is
about to go out for wider review.

Also, a reminder that STORM discussion will stop cc:'ing
other mailing lists soon.  If you're interested in STORM
work, please subscribe to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/storm

Finally - this is a near-final reminder that the rddp <at> ietf.org
mailing list will be closing soon - all discussion of RDDP
protocols will move to the storm <at> ietf.org mailing list.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
rddp <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp




--
Cheers,
Arkady Kanevsky
_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips

Gmane