6 Jun 2005 18:47
Re: AS with different DPC in SUA without GT
Andrew Booth <abooth <at> pt.com>
2005-06-06 16:47:33 GMT
2005-06-06 16:47:33 GMT
It doesn't sound to me like Relay Node funtionality is needed here. The SG in this case is terminating the traffic: it's sending the traffic to an SCCP User. To support your configuration the SG must allow multiple PCs on the platform, similar to an Alias PC or SPMC configuration. I think it's fair to say that not every verndor will support this feature. Possibly of interest: Q.704 section 2.2.1, when a message is received from MTP says: Even if an SPC is present in the "called party address" parameter, it shall not be used by SCRC. My interpretation is that AS should be selected using the DPC from the MTP Routing Label and the SSN from the CLD Address, but others may have a different interpretation. Regards, Andrew Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: >HyeonSeung, > >Where the SUA RFC says "GTT", read "Address Translation" or >"Address Mapping Function (AMF)": actually having a GT is not >necessary -- PC + SSN is a valid address. > >I cannot help you argue with a vendor, and this is supposed to(Continue reading)
RSS Feed