Re: PR-SCTP question.

Randy,

I agree with you. The solution by Brian sounds good and has far less
overhead than adding timer and ack to each FWD-TSN. 

regards,
-Qiaobing

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" wrote:
> 
> Randall,
> 
> It would also be interesting to test this solution in Delaware.
> 
> --brian
> 
> On Mon, 05 May 2003, Randall Stewart (cisco) wrote:
> 
> > Brian:
> >
> > Seems like a much better solution than having a timer..
> >
> > so we end up with:
> >
> > 1) A note in PR-SCTP about the SHUTDOWN cases as you mention.
> >
> > 2) A note in PR-SCTP regarding SACK's aka a FWD-TSN MUST be
> >     treated as a DATA chunk in regard to sending SACK's ( I think
> >     this is needed since there is no mention to it in the document
> >     currently).