Re: New version of JMS URI posted.

Hi Mark,

Mark Baker wrote:
> Eric - I'm unable to identify any portion of this new draft that
> addresses any of the previous concerns I've raised.
> 
> Unfortunately it appears that the uri-review archives are broken, as
> this message of yours is the only one present, so I can't easily point
> you at them.  But from my email archives, this was the discussion we
> had between Feb 15 and Mar 3 of this year concerning the meaning of
> "operations" and of what a jms URI actually identifies.

I have saved all that mail from that time period as well, and I have 
your questions.  Seeing as you don't specifically call out the questions 
you have that might remain, that makes it a little difficult for me to 
intuit exactly which issues we have that might be outstanding.  If you 
could restate precisely your concerns, that would be most helpful.

In the last email on the thread, I see this from you:

MB >>>>>>
When I looked at the JMS spec, what I found was these;

http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/jms/ConnectionFactory.html
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/jms/Destination.html

Is that what you meant?

<<<<<< MB